Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp3089443ybk; Mon, 18 May 2020 17:41:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtjM4GWROnyNyZGobqT/m58zwF4baDQJOlb8hY0jV/Kjpa6S7+Jf1bYEIKSs8Ytaydq4Tq X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9157:: with SMTP id y23mr16524651ejw.0.1589848898283; Mon, 18 May 2020 17:41:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589848898; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vbdoh31Ezu4/zG/BMjqE+YqPV1TN2i5c19ryzJRUEGUX0nLAifn3wozn5LRHlPfraa tCwFpZ2/mcAHSJdgSutOMoeKWENBMtj6LwpcBGa/mUU/UcqtLptXn++V5EfrYsARJRkp j1CDI6XrCD3DP7O35lk/t3LUm2fW4/s14fIPHTYULAl8FHYIEOpMzX7/q1fAEE1ULl4s u6WUkN+s/F8VKQC4YCjommK/7CZuJpznycByRvBLCUxZ3fdrHno6/uYnZYgfoQ3TZBnY BZ2x6i7dIDqDvIolyafuruwj3mTc6nY3Ul2kqPo9P4KZVXrqv6e8cCWEDKLWdAmAL50m qYFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=k+Rchrp/VZurLNX/fSTlfqIXy+1N/BwjL11lQ59js8o=; b=hHEJfIRzNgCrlJzw9dkVvgUqpSGQpoJgAYjtXvgeJ4SM+4IHDk80ACQjbzqTv5gTzu l2rHWeZ760wFcq3COvRMREJEOMM1hqDe0VeI6wYyqeyr7kT3CyS3K1+W56s6Tva5kYkh gult3CX0SF1zZEirFCPztschLwHzvqsK6bwZN5oENfcnUKoxakRdG5p1ydvcibhAt96B hRbGPhlxmSmBavbdsAbVjvRdO32w5jo9ZdTYmX4Z1JcUe69f48hrS1CHqZzBZGVzFRaA aJ+ZCMnnEstzlMvMKulZ1OYxvpKqKYzMG9VshVAdPUkB2kQVW2OMP/2ip8BT0zQy0g+r RLVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r19si6716228edm.596.2020.05.18.17.41.15; Mon, 18 May 2020 17:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727987AbgESAiD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 May 2020 20:38:03 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:59706 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726713AbgESAiC (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 20:38:02 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqGe-0002w7-Jc; Mon, 18 May 2020 18:38:00 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqGd-0004lP-G5; Mon, 18 May 2020 18:38:00 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Cc: Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Greg Ungerer , Rob Landley , Bernd Edlinger , , Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Casey Schaufler , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Andy Lutomirski References: <87h7wujhmz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87sgga6ze4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9l4zyla.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <877dx822er.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:34:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877dx822er.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 18 May 2020 19:29:00 -0500") Message-ID: <87sgfwyd84.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1jaqGd-0004lP-G5;;;mid=<87sgfwyd84.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19NGjIG6pRsk4dc9RIXJzoLeOwe3nHlUBU= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ; X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 697 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.08 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (1.7%), b_tie_ro: 10 (1.5%), parse: 1.81 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 20 (2.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 5 (0.7%), tests_pri_-1000: 16 (2.2%), tests_pri_-950: 1.57 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.30 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 80 (11.5%), check_bayes: 78 (11.2%), b_tokenize: 18 (2.6%), b_tok_get_all: 12 (1.8%), b_comp_prob: 3.9 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 40 (5.7%), b_finish: 0.93 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 550 (78.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.77 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.4%), poll_dns_idle: 0.84 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 3.0 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] exec: Remove recursion from search_binary_handler X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Recursion in kernel code is generally a bad idea as it can overflow the kernel stack. Recursion in exec also hides that the code is looping and that the loop changes bprm->file. Instead of recursing in search_binary_handler have the methods that would recurse set bprm->interpreter and return 0. Modify exec_binprm to loop when bprm->interpreter is set. Consolidate all of the reassignments of bprm->file in that loop to make it clear what is going on. The structure of the new loop in exec_binprm is that all errors return immediately, while successful completion (ret == 0 && !bprm->interpreter) just breaks out of the loop and runs what exec_bprm has always run upon successful completion. Fail if the an interpreter is being call after execfd has been set. The code has never properly handled an interpreter being called with execfd being set and with reassignments of bprm->file and the assignment of bprm->executable in generic code it has finally become possible to test and fail when if this problematic condition happens. With the reassignments of bprm->file and the assignment of bprm->executable moved into the generic code add a test to see if bprm->executable is being reassigned. In search_binary_handler remove the test for !bprm->file. With all reassignments of bprm->file moved to exec_binprm bprm->file can never be NULL in search_binary_handler. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- arch/alpha/kernel/binfmt_loader.c | 8 ++--- fs/binfmt_em86.c | 9 ++---- fs/binfmt_misc.c | 18 ++--------- fs/binfmt_script.c | 9 ++---- fs/exec.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- include/linux/binfmts.h | 3 +- 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/binfmt_loader.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/binfmt_loader.c index d712ba51d15a..e4be7a543ecf 100644 --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/binfmt_loader.c +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/binfmt_loader.c @@ -19,10 +19,6 @@ static int load_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (bprm->loader) return -ENOEXEC; - allow_write_access(bprm->file); - fput(bprm->file); - bprm->file = NULL; - loader = bprm->vma->vm_end - sizeof(void *); file = open_exec("/sbin/loader"); @@ -33,9 +29,9 @@ static int load_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm) /* Remember if the application is TASO. */ bprm->taso = eh->ah.entry < 0x100000000UL; - bprm->file = file; + bprm->interpreter = file; bprm->loader = loader; - return search_binary_handler(bprm); + return 0; } static struct linux_binfmt loader_format = { diff --git a/fs/binfmt_em86.c b/fs/binfmt_em86.c index cedde2341ade..995883693cb2 100644 --- a/fs/binfmt_em86.c +++ b/fs/binfmt_em86.c @@ -48,10 +48,6 @@ static int load_em86(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_PATH_INACCESSIBLE) return -ENOENT; - allow_write_access(bprm->file); - fput(bprm->file); - bprm->file = NULL; - /* Unlike in the script case, we don't have to do any hairy * parsing to find our interpreter... it's hardcoded! */ @@ -89,9 +85,8 @@ static int load_em86(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (IS_ERR(file)) return PTR_ERR(file); - bprm->file = file; - - return search_binary_handler(bprm); + bprm->interpreter = file; + return 0; } static struct linux_binfmt em86_format = { diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c index ad2866f28f0c..53968ea07b57 100644 --- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c +++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c @@ -159,18 +159,9 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm) goto ret; } - if (fmt->flags & MISC_FMT_OPEN_BINARY) { - /* Pass the open binary to the interpreter */ + if (fmt->flags & MISC_FMT_OPEN_BINARY) bprm->have_execfd = 1; - bprm->executable = bprm->file; - allow_write_access(bprm->file); - bprm->file = NULL; - } else { - allow_write_access(bprm->file); - fput(bprm->file); - bprm->file = NULL; - } /* make argv[1] be the path to the binary */ retval = copy_strings_kernel(1, &bprm->interp, bprm); if (retval < 0) @@ -199,14 +190,11 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (IS_ERR(interp_file)) goto ret; - bprm->file = interp_file; + bprm->interpreter = interp_file; if (fmt->flags & MISC_FMT_CREDENTIALS) bprm->preserve_creds = 1; - retval = search_binary_handler(bprm); - if (retval < 0) - goto ret; - + retval = 0; ret: dput(fmt->dentry); return retval; diff --git a/fs/binfmt_script.c b/fs/binfmt_script.c index 85e0ef86eb11..0e8b953d12cf 100644 --- a/fs/binfmt_script.c +++ b/fs/binfmt_script.c @@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_PATH_INACCESSIBLE) return -ENOENT; - /* Release since we are not mapping a binary into memory. */ - allow_write_access(bprm->file); - fput(bprm->file); - bprm->file = NULL; - /* * OK, we've parsed out the interpreter name and * (optional) argument. @@ -138,8 +133,8 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (IS_ERR(file)) return PTR_ERR(file); - bprm->file = file; - return search_binary_handler(bprm); + bprm->interpreter = file; + return 0; } static struct linux_binfmt script_format = { diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index ca91393893ea..47d831e5efde 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1710,16 +1710,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_arg_zero); /* * cycle the list of binary formats handler, until one recognizes the image */ -int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm) +static int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm) { bool need_retry = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES); struct linux_binfmt *fmt; int retval; - /* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */ - if (bprm->recursion_depth > 5) - return -ELOOP; - retval = prepare_binprm(bprm); if (retval < 0) return retval; @@ -1736,14 +1732,11 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm) continue; read_unlock(&binfmt_lock); - bprm->recursion_depth++; retval = fmt->load_binary(bprm); - bprm->recursion_depth--; read_lock(&binfmt_lock); put_binfmt(fmt); - if (bprm->point_of_no_return || !bprm->file || - (retval != -ENOEXEC)) { + if (bprm->point_of_no_return || (retval != -ENOEXEC)) { read_unlock(&binfmt_lock); return retval; } @@ -1762,12 +1755,11 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm) return retval; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler); static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) { pid_t old_pid, old_vpid; - int ret; + int ret, depth; /* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */ old_pid = current->pid; @@ -1775,15 +1767,38 @@ static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent)); rcu_read_unlock(); - ret = search_binary_handler(bprm); - if (ret >= 0) { - audit_bprm(bprm); - trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm); - ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid); - proc_exec_connector(current); + /* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */ + for (depth = 0;; depth++) { + struct file *exec; + if (depth > 5) + return -ELOOP; + + ret = search_binary_handler(bprm); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + if (!bprm->interpreter) + break; + + exec = bprm->file; + bprm->file = bprm->interpreter; + bprm->interpreter = NULL; + + allow_write_access(exec); + if (unlikely(bprm->have_execfd)) { + if (bprm->executable) { + fput(exec); + return -ENOEXEC; + } + bprm->executable = exec; + } else + fput(exec); } - return ret; + audit_bprm(bprm); + trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm); + ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid); + proc_exec_connector(current); + return 0; } /* diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h index 653508b25815..7fc05929c967 100644 --- a/include/linux/binfmts.h +++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ struct linux_binprm { #ifdef __alpha__ unsigned int taso:1; #endif - unsigned int recursion_depth; /* only for search_binary_handler() */ struct file * executable; /* Executable to pass to the interpreter */ + struct file * interpreter; struct file * file; struct cred *cred; /* new credentials */ int unsafe; /* how unsafe this exec is (mask of LSM_UNSAFE_*) */ @@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ static inline void insert_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *fmt) extern void unregister_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *); extern int __must_check remove_arg_zero(struct linux_binprm *); -extern int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *); extern int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm); extern void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm); extern void finalize_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm); -- 2.25.0