Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 08:59:36 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
        Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@codeaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>,
        Chandana Kishori Chiluveru <cchiluve@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add interconnect support in dwc3
 driver
Message-ID: <20200519032936.jyav3fhopumymo4h@vireshk-i7>
References: <1585718145-29537-1-git-send-email-sanm@codeaurora.org>
 <1585718145-29537-3-git-send-email-sanm@codeaurora.org>
 <878shu4uwk.fsf@kernel.org>
 <875zcy4uuj.fsf@kernel.org>
 <20200514171352.GP4525@google.com>
 <abbc3f8c-c8c9-c189-735e-f8058dab3e40@linaro.org>
 <87tv0h3fpv.fsf@kernel.org>
 <090e48d7-7988-eea1-bf39-f6820578d354@linaro.org>
 <87r1vl3e42.fsf@kernel.org>
 <20200518183512.GE2165@builder.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200518183512.GE2165@builder.lan>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18-05-20, 11:35, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> This misses the case where INTERCONNECT=n and USB_DWC3_QCOM=[ym] which
> I don't see a reason for breaking.
> 
> But if only INTERCONNECT where a bool, then we don't need to specify a
> depends on, because it will either be there, or the stubs will.
> We've come to this conclusion in a lot of different frameworks and I
> don't see why we should do this differently with INTERCONNECT.

INTERCONNECT is a bool now and the patch has been pushed to linux-next
already.

-- 
viresh