Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 14:19:03 +0200
From:   Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>
To:     Nikita Sobolev <Nikita.Sobolev@synopsys.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>,
        Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
        Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
        Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
        linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Kernel selftests: Add check if tpm devices are
 supported
Message-ID: <20200519121903.GB26265@dell5510>
Reply-To: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>
References: <20200519120743.41358-1-Nikita.Sobolev@synopsys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200519120743.41358-1-Nikita.Sobolev@synopsys.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> tpm2 tests set uses /dev/tpm0 and /dev/tpmrm0 without check if they
> are available. In case, when these devices are not available test
> fails, but expected behaviour is skipped test.

> Signed-off-by: Nikita Sobolev <Nikita.Sobolev@synopsys.com>
OK, I see it was also reverted by Jarkko

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20200518&id=aaa2d92efe1f972567f1691b423ab8dc606ab3a9

I wonder if only wrong shell syntax (self.flags = flags) is a problem.

Kind regards,
Petr