Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp3496267ybk; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:11:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfOVpoDO/svc9TFo4ws1+QRdidxTT3haGk201C3/BHaYpbYd2et+vqChCAdhe4ON8KjnnH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:509:: with SMTP id j9mr18438503eja.152.1589893877221; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:11:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589893877; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ofOGJuWAmKAp3Ww+pU7QilCTl9njspbAJsCoJh4Fs1dGkYsJ2i8/2xG7VMxBzWYwnC iqs7ElFO57qLcK7LbUtQM2WyzgWFrQgv/bq9U/T86Ten5lmCt73x7+7y6UOHNoBaotwX NEgfniZGGIFwjhTpVC1riG6ZhRz/hzdVJtHYfutOc8sQpQI7NNOIIcIvVACsT+Ct/0NM FxNJLlZESHgr7fTkoBveQ+7bSKdSYkDZInIIW1hItsiNw2tP8+FB+ULVxu4bACkFsm++ jR0Q9QWEGIHUvRYqfX9P2m5mPCljNiiR/eEods90t2JGgUMzBAtNLj9h/7Azdk+Z2qPz hUbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Owd8w23sKJnYwtdRMz/02Wxs/sCgJAtWumyomSw5smk=; b=uHbi0g5f/8LdWesCZ6yjS2MPEtrJury3w2gzrWUvQov69YbiBjNmQsqscmqTdHIU2m CQaaaa30yse+i4SJesCVerpjNWDcup/DCa9WimL/l1MKMr3c7PMw0PSsQ13oPBycbex0 jiX8nnd7SFwDLjz2Nd97gZc5XSQ4h6I0BUdeUYqVjXnho8ZDUgJKLUNwCqXVX/poXnDm xHZa8BcFwuz8tdvt1KSRRWX1IAp9ReugfyJAoEchhP89H+4LHHkWiW5hCpK4BAzkaenX dhnFazfKzzKEDnRDFuQ3P57X8UyQtjA7p5MwSCrrsRMsPAHZ94zstOsSK0Vc/2sLkEoN EHcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=f34fIThx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k13si8110146edn.344.2020.05.19.06.10.50; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=f34fIThx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728832AbgESNGW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 May 2020 09:06:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726991AbgESNGV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 09:06:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com (mail-pj1-x1042.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CA5C08C5C0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id ci21so1320066pjb.3 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Owd8w23sKJnYwtdRMz/02Wxs/sCgJAtWumyomSw5smk=; b=f34fIThxjnHezKXAhGE705YOQqEfgg1Pe3wOaxMR7RCVj0cthZk+EC9jbpdJBqpHSo BozTDJLjNlnBdlKWY1BZjKOWiw82owIdVTl5jVmUpqNI6fTZyo6tCDGjWrpsNe9YFolo 14XJF43noJ4TIg8NTOF4Itg4tBO/jfTcHcfLTXDOzhCioofQZjvU5ONpXPtm3s0MOIX/ Q5ReYVWd8hcdne6wJh5Hzao2x7BCeU3MSuuSJiRyaD1fiputX0duEOZh5Uo6MiS6HKrm y3UGZr8J79W/SXE5M+/ieptijy+2ZA9IgRcwXezDvVTz7RaMDoRWyxY7887XahUpKWS1 AOqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Owd8w23sKJnYwtdRMz/02Wxs/sCgJAtWumyomSw5smk=; b=J3cAZNPbhUi8D9StX3Zkmm0hCFfqTPuHjWzR3e8VlwB0XM8X6hdSfq1yi2bzU3ym6a eQhMpWfHjX8tFqQjM71rTYGF98qd3eARQfr0pPTx1n6OPFO/AUaLeNsHzHgAuDB9cYfn On4kOVzsj0B4ti//aQvbKhoK+1XrKkzaJQePiK8NUqdEA553Re3H6WY/oXKhUphkj3ak ixqAcrF39SG1o71lfSmQmmPflLtZeW+nMLYJjvYi2UmOVP7TvL10Rgtdz7Tk+oikSt9K jQmCV2E6pwIgX32yu6lzvLq2m4XOyxpK5evEfO0Ae/4BsPUey6T98A6pXyQlSS+IlfAN g6TA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ByJ7dtir1EW4gnR46Jx+jK862dLHJ1Otkf+mfoFL/PAZhF7cn UhIfgtIH9OVaP8+2/b7R+TKDDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fa95:: with SMTP id cu21mr4884258pjb.106.1589893581072; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:2cd:202:2523:d194:de3b:636f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gd1sm2299753pjb.14.2020.05.19.06.06.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 May 2020 06:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 06:06:14 -0700 From: Michel Lespinasse To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Laurent Dufour , Liam Howlett , Jerome Glisse , Davidlohr Bueso , David Rientjes , Hugh Dickins , Ying Han , Jason Gunthorpe , Daniel Jordan Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 09/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_assert_locked() and mmap_assert_write_locked() Message-ID: <20200519130614.GC189720@google.com> References: <20200422001422.232330-1-walken@google.com> <20200422001422.232330-11-walken@google.com> <20200422015829.GR5820@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200423015917.GA13910@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200424012612.GA158937@google.com> <20200424013858.GB158937@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:01:33PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 4/24/20 3:38 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > +static inline void mmap_assert_locked(struct mm_struct *mm) > > +{ > > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!lockdep_is_held_type(&mm->mmap_sem, -1), mm); > > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem), mm); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void mmap_assert_write_locked(struct mm_struct *mm) > > +{ > > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!lockdep_is_held_type(&mm->mmap_sem, 0), mm); > > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem), mm); > > +} > > I would remove VM_BUG_ON_MM() from the lockdep part. If kernel has lockdep > enabled, it's already in heavy debugging mode enough so let's just use it and > not depend on DEBUG_VM. Many sites you convert don't require DEBUG_VM for the > lockdep checks. > > With that you can also use the standard lockdep_assert_held() and > lockdep_assert_held_write() wrappers. > > If user has both lockdep and DEBUG_VM enabled, should we run both variants? > Perhaps lockdep is enough as it's more comprehensive? Your initial v5 version > was doing that. Thanks, changed these to lockdep_assert_held() / lockdep_assert_held_write() as suggested. This misses dumping out the mm, but I think there is only limited value in that. I did keep the rwsem_is_locked fallback as people had commented earlier about getting assertions in the non-lockdep case. If both are enabled... then we'll get somewhat redundant assertions, but I think that is fine (better to keep the code simple than try to work around that). -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.