Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752059AbWCOM2f (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:28:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752065AbWCOM2f (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:28:35 -0500 Received: from smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.216]:335 "HELO smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752059AbWCOM2f (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:28:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XElVqfm4AQW6L715WhltNvZy3UCuDRfqJ7o0XtQ7BHyA87jneo2nZw5IBvd/eY1KLWVYrzHbSY6oLMed7HPBSMaJmns8axxZa10q9HYEpWWZSkMdguWTPzsdsEF7yy5USLbekmFr4/538i7K4ihvNvHppRo3hhkpD9467D4QxZU= ; Message-ID: <44180784.6020608@yahoo.com.au> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:24:36 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Richard Moser CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ORMAP References: <44178429.90808@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <44178429.90808@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1493 Lines: 41 John Richard Moser wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > And looking through the recent discussions I see in one thread... > > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >>It depends a lot on what people do with it in fact. For instance, it >>works better in memory-constrained systems, probably thanks to rmap. >>I have one 2.6 running reliably on my web server (hppa) where 2.4 >>regularly oopsed because of low memory. > > > > This reminds me, what the hell ever happened to ORMAP? That object > based rmap thingy I tried out in one of wli's patches made my system > boot like 3 times faster. There were other cool things going on that I > never got to try too, never saw that all out to fruition. > > Status on some of the elements in the old 2.6-wli series from around > there would be nice. I'm curious as to what has gone in. > 2.6 has an object based rmap system working nicely for quite a while now (though it was probably not exactly what you saw in the -wli tree, but a derivative). It would be surprising if that made your system boot 3 times faster though (unless it was on the edge of a swap storm or something) -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/