Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752121AbWCOQUJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:20:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752127AbWCOQUJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:20:09 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.192.81]:54215 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752121AbWCOQUH (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:20:07 -0500 Message-ID: <44183E75.3080406@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:19:01 -0500 From: John Richard Moser User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ORMAP References: <44178429.90808@comcast.net> <44180784.6020608@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <44180784.6020608@yahoo.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3191 Lines: 82 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Piggin wrote: > John Richard Moser wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> And looking through the recent discussions I see in one thread... >> >> Willy Tarreau wrote: >> >> >>> It depends a lot on what people do with it in fact. For instance, it >>> works better in memory-constrained systems, probably thanks to rmap. >>> I have one 2.6 running reliably on my web server (hppa) where 2.4 >>> regularly oopsed because of low memory. >> >> >> >> This reminds me, what the hell ever happened to ORMAP? That object >> based rmap thingy I tried out in one of wli's patches made my system >> boot like 3 times faster. There were other cool things going on that I >> never got to try too, never saw that all out to fruition. >> >> Status on some of the elements in the old 2.6-wli series from around >> there would be nice. I'm curious as to what has gone in. >> > > 2.6 has an object based rmap system working nicely for quite > a while now (though it was probably not exactly what you saw > in the -wli tree, but a derivative). > > It would be surprising if that made your system boot 3 times > faster though (unless it was on the edge of a swap storm or > something) Dramatization. It was probably around 30 seconds faster on a 2-3 minute boot sequence (I had a lot in rc.d), but it was noticeable :P I was wondering about that stuff. There used to be a few cute things out there but I can't remember any of it now. Page clustering etc etc. > - -- All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating new problems waiting out there. -- Eric Steven Raymond We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their cattle! -- Evil alien overlord from Blasto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBRBg+dAs1xW0HCTEFAQIXyBAAhdWBblyl3Ao+F3pS5IxDxYiPeZzMfVzG zAacNT77huYYY748DDQgXJvpEGvgCqWtiaHgI0PpZoSLWytzcIr4TjXcMrwC1bcD yGuV6C9pYnjwyaqhaCs11DAOduXGsMf6gSERp1Q3oFnT3x42wLpmHQtAZD4eOmxF q6P1RxYTkF2Tgnu3pQOTvTgTziUUPEXt1ZQwocshZGuAHrsDM846DHjw7fwmCu4w 2nGVPJmHsqyZ6savimstzBoLKLAQs+7+hIeb/YJP46NrLa5VbJRLUfKqBoOH/PCs U7NS8qj5Gvq4YsDd5NAzT8ALiW66EBWQKdi3/SAkeu+JE28CjWzHiLEb4G+sosGV AWLdgzY6HthlNoM9/zasDRrHvcL8reCrTTBMngvyT7NWMm5qzzEOq7y9k24gMBbp EGdk7Tol4hSxinuhH2lur8It1rXaMVyOiBflrqXNvwKfbxXG1FXQifCNTQiAvMoc LjyDC2V7Eqx22ZEy5X/Gj5b3Ah9oOnLrWsCAsl7K2XTKg+CRUOrQ4NKzGbbFxb4f QumTcq60qmUei0AcGMze8grQGi0JotQ0CpcXTvIYujPFJzJ6kRu4NC8kMst3RUMg MFXLnzrCNOMvTnVuA2t8MqXkeaWKUvm8qQbJChcsKV/RIGbW8JeWoM2+xIXhbOx1 Kv8Mw4ch8lU= =k6aR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/