Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp246388ybk; Tue, 19 May 2020 21:31:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCtlpWz8J+XBPkdxnARL5lRMWD2w4kyux4siDpugZqpZvfEV3+QvcG0HqaPP6pZvXdSgDv X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:90d4:: with SMTP id v20mr2170828ejw.476.1589949091371; Tue, 19 May 2020 21:31:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589949091; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CB7PNHX8VWDXuakaS2bC5V6ouQdPAXw/vOOyui+LMpjwRe81cm5A3/ZPV8Qj+yARAi /SdkT9CBaZ4dVou2GWLILDbPZCr7cHrwJ9bZGuE1UcTZgKBVWv3yBNDeOuhOhXenEFQN /Pu9r8GJG9Oacon5zFjJZ4NrguT6WP8aMksLY25DcigxJfTPx7bcirbw21nx1YzRm8cx A3VxIfdRPSuskq2qCwO8KcWPVXTiEA4+4ffl1ufftX1WQZclTFNdRmun7KVKrrQmfuJZ I2CoWbb3biLWeVUnvSVGBSaEjLYC20RmiKB/qUkY2S7UNtCvJVEKCBmbaDxPQAjU7skU gBRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=qB4g/0OK2M95amCUha+5o5M/2DyWX/7BtQICnnkR5QY=; b=EAFXfenatVH3gF/h3xefdOJKRmiEuavRks+xB1U2Ai98w2yxrukSuezeH2j6pMG8PQ U1VlR6lAE4h0DY8Ul9zHMfNN8BGKob5pDMtPSWiW2z1hyFiRW4Iq8jvgNUm3yZNhp1uL 1BsgeuEYF3ff2ef+0w6L2v5TVNp8CvI6/xMc+Ut+KhZbV9azUHhUJpQXhEw5Hy5aobTS aNmwF3XSzp+DwDpZPNlRceNzrUkRqQyJJEFxgNfQs/Y2PEf6da01dSxI/FwNUfJ8m4+K tzUJSBoJ4nTt41OSVUQD7LAxgTgH5eaaKsf4phi8elk/rlUa2ma6qtgiVQ3y8zQuZUqS nefA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v19si768558edq.603.2020.05.19.21.31.09; Tue, 19 May 2020 21:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726662AbgETE3p (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 May 2020 00:29:45 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:54957 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726435AbgETE3o (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 00:29:44 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 7cT0D8+0oC+ez5uPIXzx89dkQH+fG+D73N8QcZUnapAY7hXLX1NQ3bwKn6Pi7mP181IuP72104 GJt+pwBL/DhA== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2020 21:29:43 -0700 IronPort-SDR: DgGJec+UiF56OYM/PQVay8HxbOCNLl4zv10MVNFrOz1QxLMBS4w1T/ZykvjB4qGCNP4ReitugF a7vzIc8H9Ngg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,412,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="289217288" Received: from kbl-ppc.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.118]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2020 21:29:41 -0700 From: Jin Yao To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, Jin Yao Subject: [PATCH v6 1/5] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat for interval mode Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:27:33 +0800 Message-Id: <20200520042737.24160-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200520042737.24160-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> References: <20200520042737.24160-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat --per-thread -e cycles,instructions -I1000 --interval-count 2 1.004171683 perf-3696 8,747,311 cycles ... 1.004171683 perf-3696 691,730 instructions # 0.08 insn per cycle ... 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,749,936 cycles ... 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,484,582 instructions # 0.28 insn per cycle ... Let's see interval 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,749,936 cycles perf-3696 1,484,582 instructions # 0.28 insn per cycle insn per cycle = 1,484,582 / 1,749,936 = 0.85. But now it's 0.28, that's not correct. stat_config.stats[] records the per-thread runtime stat. But for interval mode, it should be reset for each interval. So now, with this patch, root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat --per-thread -e cycles,instructions -I1000 --interval-count 2 1.005818121 perf-8633 9,898,045 cycles ... 1.005818121 perf-8633 693,298 instructions # 0.07 insn per cycle ... 2.007863743 perf-8633 1,551,619 cycles ... 2.007863743 perf-8633 1,317,514 instructions # 0.85 insn per cycle ... Let's check interval 2.007863743. insn per cycle = 1,317,514 / 1,551,619 = 0.85. It's correct. This patch creates runtime_stat_reset, places it next to untime_stat_new/runtime_stat_delete and moves all runtime_stat functions before process_interval. v4: --- Create runtime_stat_reset. Fixes: commit 14e72a21c783 ("perf stat: Update or print per-thread stats") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao --- tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c index e0c1ad23c768..f3b3a59ac7d2 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c @@ -351,6 +351,46 @@ static void read_counters(struct timespec *rs) } } +static int runtime_stat_new(struct perf_stat_config *config, int nthreads) +{ + int i; + + config->stats = calloc(nthreads, sizeof(struct runtime_stat)); + if (!config->stats) + return -1; + + config->stats_num = nthreads; + + for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) + runtime_stat__init(&config->stats[i]); + + return 0; +} + +static void runtime_stat_delete(struct perf_stat_config *config) +{ + int i; + + if (!config->stats) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) + runtime_stat__exit(&config->stats[i]); + + zfree(&config->stats); +} + +static void runtime_stat_reset(struct perf_stat_config *config) +{ + int i; + + if (!config->stats) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) + perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&config->stats[i]); +} + static void process_interval(void) { struct timespec ts, rs; @@ -359,6 +399,7 @@ static void process_interval(void) diff_timespec(&rs, &ts, &ref_time); perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat); + runtime_stat_reset(&stat_config); read_counters(&rs); if (STAT_RECORD) { @@ -1737,35 +1778,6 @@ int process_cpu_map_event(struct perf_session *session, return set_maps(st); } -static int runtime_stat_new(struct perf_stat_config *config, int nthreads) -{ - int i; - - config->stats = calloc(nthreads, sizeof(struct runtime_stat)); - if (!config->stats) - return -1; - - config->stats_num = nthreads; - - for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) - runtime_stat__init(&config->stats[i]); - - return 0; -} - -static void runtime_stat_delete(struct perf_stat_config *config) -{ - int i; - - if (!config->stats) - return; - - for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) - runtime_stat__exit(&config->stats[i]); - - zfree(&config->stats); -} - static const char * const stat_report_usage[] = { "perf stat report []", NULL, -- 2.17.1