Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp338043ybk; Wed, 20 May 2020 00:36:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwW4EXoKDFYyr8vSdsYt1B+knNFzO8oKyPpSROhkrpHoyuMjSmZV439p6rcqBMGXHDujdu4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:770b:: with SMTP id q11mr2548580ejm.224.1589960206639; Wed, 20 May 2020 00:36:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589960206; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wJ6b2cW8l71zXWNmwTXSVgilynEBRw/lUIdfAItxXO1PiVEdjupUK0vVbcClmkeQpA dWgRS62ncAgYermlylj6TShsRV+95/t1G1fCBe1holyGRf09pPUjhgFCzpEsISr4B0rV xFR4xukqWqtK4wOorloVQuXvg0xQHeJQiI+Ps/Ow1tMMYis07LmkuviHtW32Fa+Qqtao pwA+E0C2lax2ep25vW5/N5TAkOfxzipBzuRms7+sfTYtuoWAabRSxVgJL2nU3k2jDq3S CTNa3/lnWEVYvtBW1hObj9FztC8+H++PhbQyrJlwjAs6FSqPXUmydQIlRU7CyIg0nyFo v1CQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=VfcekzJCan2B7C+vng8WaKitp9wnyMh8WoZOorv+eKA=; b=jffWOjpsP2A4/9ZeN0rRCsTx00tN/RwPzEPbMYrBRFNKdJM4XX0/6pY7bHyBMb+k8u UHok2TJj0wk+pRP3t2clbuUZnkYWuNfTKzKvd46fTgel1d5mcuwiyMClRCRSQtKswgg8 Ngcx5btLIJG/WamKcwOgx5DQQ6O2ciy1lvF0eAjkH4TPmP7zH+h/WGBMVmHSiUYH37Qo bU1+tMyuDIdgP7EkxyLzIoVCCk86Sgc6nx617WGg193cGZMgdw1dvjxSj8GN7i69buiB gGaizFI5qksxzE3IP//G+RB1R2bqGJsyKsblJes+UdfPyG5l3736SWRr4mt2TjOfYC7k 6yqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=sKQjNrWs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s20si1326654eju.605.2020.05.20.00.36.23; Wed, 20 May 2020 00:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=sKQjNrWs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726520AbgETHcz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:55 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:3330 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726309AbgETHcy (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:54 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Wed, 20 May 2020 00:32:42 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Wed, 20 May 2020 00:32:54 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Wed, 20 May 2020 00:32:54 -0700 Received: from [10.2.90.179] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 20 May 2020 07:32:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 10/10] mmap locking API: rename mmap_sem to mmap_lock To: Michel Lespinasse CC: Matthew Wilcox , Laurent Dufour , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Vlastimil Babka , Liam Howlett , Jerome Glisse , Davidlohr Bueso , David Rientjes , Hugh Dickins , Ying Han , Jason Gunthorpe , Daniel Jordan References: <20200422001422.232330-1-walken@google.com> <20200422001422.232330-11-walken@google.com> <20200422015829.GR5820@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200423015917.GA13910@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200424012612.GA158937@google.com> <20200424013958.GC158937@google.com> <20200519131009.GD189720@google.com> <7c540ac9-ba44-7187-5dc2-60b4c761e91c@linux.ibm.com> <20200519153251.GY16070@bombadil.infradead.org> <10d48b77-5c6e-2e10-84e6-16cdd76a45f1@nvidia.com> From: John Hubbard X-Nvconfidentiality: public Message-ID: <9c45327f-5542-c033-ec5e-201e9b0583aa@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 00:32:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1589959962; bh=VfcekzJCan2B7C+vng8WaKitp9wnyMh8WoZOorv+eKA=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:X-Nvconfidentiality: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sKQjNrWs7FFZ5lMu/k6F8hbVIhDRoE1dadrgLMiGhCOG+Impk1HvTYGl6l/l0TpY5 GnD0bQS4zFK82fSIzAmzD6Cq5lJYQUFnIadRE+xNaIhZrxB9Z5OclF+Xfmm9oJEdmW YWs31UueL0HhlA2UhytrcYxLA+AjZylmGRguiyIFg3gTaDQmp0SKJe9SJMd2nqXORF hkKGCnHoY7g82M18x+Tgd+zL+U5WqB1n2b/AbbKR5/9fdwm95rk8gYXEWJ7QMuGdAL vTSAJzOdDAAUTdUBQw+7nTKnUJhHdT+QXaiHb48sZyXzuJ3glfEps8t6mTT3p4Npw+ k1IPqqsDB6rgQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-05-19 19:39, Michel Lespinasse wrote: ... >> That gives you additional options inside internal_get_user_pages_fast(), such >> as, approximately: >> >> if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FAST_ONLY)) >> might_lock_read(¤t->mm->mmap_lock); >> >> ...not that that is necessarily a great idea, seeing as how it merely changes >> "might lock" into "maybe might lock". :) > > I think that is completely fine, makes sure everyone not using > FOLL_FAST_ONLY realizes that the call could block. > > Can I ask you to add that assertion in your patchset ? Based on > Matthew's feedback, I would do it in my patchset, but it doesn't seem > worth doing if we know this will conflict with your changes. > Sure, that's no problem. Although it looks like my changes may land in mmotm first, and then your patchset, so maybe the right move is to make this change *after* both of those things happen, yes? thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA