Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 20:43:33 +0900
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t
Message-ID: <20200520114333.GC520@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
References: <20200415170046.33374-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20200515160245.GW17734@linux-b0ei>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200515160245.GW17734@linux-b0ei>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (20/05/15 18:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
> 
> It seems that everything was explained and the patches look good to
> me. If we allowed %ptR then it makes sense to allow %ptT as well.
> 
> For all three patches:
> 
> Rewieved-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>

	-ss