Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751811AbWCOW5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:57:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751818AbWCOW5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:57:18 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:22756 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811AbWCOW5R (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:57:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:57:12 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Sam Ravnborg cc: Arjan van de Ven , j4K3xBl4sT3r , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? In-Reply-To: <20060313182725.GA31211@mars.ravnborg.org> Message-ID: References: <436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com> <1142237867.3023.8.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060313182725.GA31211@mars.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 497 Lines: 16 > >On another denx.de page I found this summary (so you do not have to >visit the page): ># slow to build: 2.6 takes 30...40% longer to compile A side effect of all the new optimizations that went into gcc since 2.95, I would say. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/