Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 14:04:50 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] locking: Introduce local_lock()
Message-ID: <20200520120450.GL317569@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200519201912.1564477-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20200519201912.1564477-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200519201912.1564477-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:19:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> +/**
> + * DEFINE_LOCAL_LOCK - Define and initialize a per CPU local lock
> + * @lock:	Name of the lock instance
> + */
> +#define DEFINE_LOCAL_LOCK(lvar)					\
> +	DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct local_lock, lvar) = { INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lvar) }
> +
> +/**
> + * DECLARE_LOCAL_LOCK - Declare a defined per CPU local lock
> + * @lock:	Name of the lock instance
> + */
> +#define DECLARE_LOCAL_LOCK(lvar)				\
> +	DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct local_lock, lvar)

So I think I'm going to argue having these is a mistake. The local_lock
should be put in a percpu structure along with the data it actually
protects.


> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +# define LL_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)	.dep_map = { .name = #lockname }

That wants to be:

	.dep_map = {
		.name = #lockname,
		.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_SPIN,
	}

> +#else
> +# define LL_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
> +#endif