Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp527660ybk; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAhi7stkekDJCg3xdDpuQFS2hsUFM5D02PnpFCHugtz+j88nxe/7hWGudZoE0Q1pJlkE9k X-Received: by 2002:a50:e444:: with SMTP id e4mr3115881edm.191.1589979128410; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589979128; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ADaEdKDFx5YACschGywqSMSgPTNBr192crCzm3hms0DnYc/HDRti0VwcD1m0DAAJtB Y9kA+UYixYi6KyY/pLls8XvtssLphH4XRlYDjTvgFDZDdTb0ndDmRfiTPcgAr2ayN+Lu /LA5PCUOazZMaE9resj14uRoVmtwGMFO3YO68FZ2Y1E+Kl1Xgw70tGGbohSFO/3k7VW2 gh1OECAWgBgV+74ZKxDKQJ9LfQnRnb4FflUSwrK8orNWXrlvguBKi227kDyQiI2FrAi0 RSQmybtUTMsy8BWjRVHUDsrvkcsvkycQlU/RJzGG0czDJxaDBlV0ylHUBUQz0j+Zeyuu UXKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=je/KbnslOZKPvi+gdbk2BorRQK9HerFcoy4nD5X6lMM=; b=PZfxUydsn7xtXZX9T+FoIxsuwHsYJxDg9s5bASUk7Ei2xhlcacntUVni3+0K+2JtUL HsDaFLjYyoxzjY7EODB+szihYuxlPJS0+TYSre+PtCNQy3BI3Kv+LuoToTqfUAgQP4IC Q8HihyTw9HRFA9YAS54S8q7StwcnNwR7xJpCiBkTkGcv2pWEgYP6ONVImPSHsOVP4fDY 43rCry/U3tsa8wj6lRodKBOkwlKT3/C031jWsvQ9tZ/UrBSkIRHhHzBWiruJU9dGTzlE aUhtwvGdoWDEa3b1X2ONA5FwJrgryO1+dsbdGuDLHECTzBhxtrQn23aXMlKzBeQZL4dz jYeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=NKiIB31r; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k11si1479994edj.518.2020.05.20.05.51.44; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=NKiIB31r; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726822AbgETMsV (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 May 2020 08:48:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726650AbgETMsU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 08:48:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf43.google.com (mail-qv1-xf43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C9DC061A0E for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf43.google.com with SMTP id l3so1219737qvo.7 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:48:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=je/KbnslOZKPvi+gdbk2BorRQK9HerFcoy4nD5X6lMM=; b=NKiIB31rUNec8vPy5B581Ac3XHacW4bKFkiRsrE64Ih4KYBq8+vE7e6JqfUsABdEEs vpEWvb2tq7FEsIQQ7SlWvqCtsFj8Y6eQz8bHkER5KF5DxHCd3cF8ddiES1gge5xyggyC woCsKccdrLS1Pa2+DKIj1RFtH4b/rdouJtV4rI89ssc0/a0Pfvbnrdcbpj5X1PYFe/du NlfzXFkUIsb/bxVA1uLZfeUJib3SXDMEgFDgU+pr04YShYQZ1xwhYE3oe3BxJg+ltOav rSDV7Wnut8vVcWwyY3O2fDe6KMHW5muXkuRMe6RltEdiK3sknldDfVTCcTf5EcwVoyMv c5aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=je/KbnslOZKPvi+gdbk2BorRQK9HerFcoy4nD5X6lMM=; b=PbhXe1JdAElWCO7OBz9Vy7H1H3gJ2novntRnCj7q+EjW5PvijanOVi9ddX5X3DKTUi f6vWrdJWPY3FqiYEeBCYoYFNnQ/uCap7EWTkYIgENcery6X4FiBT1IYergNHZ1eO6vWx wpPkhOOz/GHPXv5l02H1Ooi/ms4oW1M9vCTdgr6vkX97brqAKxrJ98rgBCxvpLe9scuT /MkD3gSjR8MC1fi/xmIouKIJaDi4u0EtTN7sk0J2AFlzGjIzk/zZISwg904O8zuZ3jgb E/uiJKeVRag10tFZIaPkpSwsHwRxpwePY72b7kHECNSMsOEkwdbUiCrxvtXrupJ9khaH bnxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531heG5bSiLK0+YzJqatBnDYulIJuc5TminVhmquRCE/4g+F6bXh zZ5+0k2pJg942deTnfjyNMkc5A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:42f:: with SMTP id a15mr4609714qvy.212.1589978898653; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-48-30.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.48.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j83sm1912436qke.7.2020.05.20.05.48.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 May 2020 05:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbO8v-00063L-Du; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:48:17 -0300 Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:48:17 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Michel Lespinasse Cc: John Hubbard , Matthew Wilcox , Laurent Dufour , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Vlastimil Babka , Liam Howlett , Jerome Glisse , Davidlohr Bueso , David Rientjes , Hugh Dickins , Ying Han , Daniel Jordan Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 10/10] mmap locking API: rename mmap_sem to mmap_lock Message-ID: <20200520124817.GG31189@ziepe.ca> References: <20200423015917.GA13910@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200424012612.GA158937@google.com> <20200424013958.GC158937@google.com> <20200519131009.GD189720@google.com> <7c540ac9-ba44-7187-5dc2-60b4c761e91c@linux.ibm.com> <20200519153251.GY16070@bombadil.infradead.org> <10d48b77-5c6e-2e10-84e6-16cdd76a45f1@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:39:30PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > > I think this assertion should be deleted from this driver. It's there > > > in case get_user_pages_fast() takes the mmap sem. It would make sense to > > > have this assertion in get_user_pages_fast() in case we take the fast path > > > which doesn't acquire the mmap_sem. Something like this: > > I like this idea a lot - having might_lock assertions in > get_user_pages_fast makes a log more sense than doing the same at the > call sites. +1 I've wanted to see more complete lockdep annotations in gup.c for a while now.. There has been a number of bugs this would have caught Jason