Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 15:38:27 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/20] mips: csrc-r4k: Decrease r4k-clocksource rating
 if CPU_FREQ enabled
Message-ID: <20200520133827.GA17714@alpha.franken.de>
References: <20200506174238.15385-19-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
 <20200508154150.GB22247@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200511133121.cz5axbwynhmqkx7x@mobilestation>
 <20200515074827.6p5zx4sb3bmavjih@mobilestation>
 <20200515210647.GA22922@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200518134820.wedoumgbsllvhem6@mobilestation>
 <20200518163206.GA17800@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200518205752.txbylbjt2zkwdwwe@mobilestation>
 <20200519155053.GB15797@alpha.franken.de>
 <20200520121201.wohv6u646rx5otkf@mobilestation>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200520121201.wohv6u646rx5otkf@mobilestation>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:12:01PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Since you don't like the way I initially fixed it, suppose there we don't have
> another way but to introduce something like CONFIG_MIPS_CPS_NS16550_WIDTH
> parameter to select a proper accessors, like sw in our case, and sb by defaul).
> Right?

to be on the safe side it's probably the best thing. But I don't know
enough about CPS_NS16550 to judge whether shift value correlates with
possible access width.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]