Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:55:45 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, maule@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
Message-ID: <20060315235544.GA6504@suse.de>
References: <44172F0E.6070708@ce.jp.nec.com> <20060314134535.72eb7243.akpm@osdl.org> <44176502.9050109@ce.jp.nec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44176502.9050109@ce.jp.nec.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 855
Lines: 23

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:51:14PM -0500, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >One option might be to create inclued/linux/msi.h, put this declaration in
> >there then include <asm/msi.h>.  Possibly some other declarations should be
> >moved into linux/msi.h as well.
> 
> How about the attached one?
> Build tested on ia64 with both CONFIG_PCI_MSI y and n.

No, we don't need a linux/msi.h, these are core pci things that no one
else should care about.  The other arches handle this just fine, let's
not mess everything up just because ia64 can't get it right :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/