Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp631467ybk; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:09:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNPnNm+h9TVib5RUNiCyNKmP3xxd5ET8jXJN1LND0eSfSONpLBi5BlyqLsxVe3eEpBEVPM X-Received: by 2002:a50:dac4:: with SMTP id s4mr3969204edj.84.1589987349831; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589987349; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r66DBDhea0Zt4keQC01rdo0SAnvShhSJljXUgJLwtArm0Q93dcZ1l23F3SAcna73XZ pR0AKu0otFQVUWp8twoVlfTcXp6+yc9CYgO22vaNzOnW+qsnwJjhP9fVks3ah/9t7p5E 2s6mNwHPbsJ0tADElBPOttMxxWh70m63fHIgsZNwsUDAPmJFvin5s54jWfNxlcB02161 msj4wehWbphWx0TLMqvnpgURkxkx/zKz3WKQ1jLhPt92tUyZOxOFOnEwaXlZjl2TQerJ +H1gCHfLp/ut2hErQDwZg0oSXIZ+InDIyyvQ1nONSk78A6Rb33JJj/H0jlbc7oJ/P7vG SaSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Sn8wqD1tozPv1zw6fxciDGJZAwQgkw7Q/Z9dLkV+8W4=; b=bfMmX7gD6gpwgCccoKxcSIlPsjQCMDASbdfaLfTlF5DctmftD56i+Al1tUfKg+OXR6 hMj1Mt7HRYVGr7Wvr/Y70PaGzN7aaBT2C2n40VO2g2OL5K7RBBYBOOTNtLPUH0NhWHv2 rB7u/y6E/j6itYIeIc7mV7MPpJvb0nD/voDluYO2Kh1EUnHDqRa2/6q49Wk71rdhiryV fIckraVjEderivAcP53/Nw7co76/6P47COSTJJ/nDt/VwVhBnNMz5OkgmB/Px418Woll ZzbtK0kp+JpJIQGGlpE+KGgb/BpndGs64Ix/HNEMLx+DMYhv3hID6RGXqr5KkoihxxJZ VXHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z9si1622434edi.65.2020.05.20.08.08.46; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726839AbgETPHZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 May 2020 11:07:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33942 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726486AbgETPHY (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 11:07:24 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCC4FC061A0E for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pty.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbQJQ-0004UT-Dl; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:07:16 +0200 Received: from ore by pty.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jbQJL-0002d2-Sm; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:07:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:07:11 +0200 From: Oleksij Rempel To: Michal Kubecek Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , mkl@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, David Jander , Jakub Kicinski , Christian Herber , "David S. Miller" , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] ethtool: provide UAPI for PHY Signal Quality Index (SQI) Message-ID: <20200520150711.rj4b22g3zhzej2aw@pengutronix.de> References: <20200520062915.29493-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20200520062915.29493-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20200520144544.GB8771@lion.mk-sys.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vqf6y3tx55aruwga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200520144544.GB8771@lion.mk-sys.cz> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 17:01:42 up 187 days, 6:20, 194 users, load average: 0.24, 0.24, 0.26 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ore@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --vqf6y3tx55aruwga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > Signal Quality Index is a mandatory value required by "OPEN Alliance > > SIG" for the 100Base-T1 PHYs [1]. This indicator can be used for cable > > integrity diagnostic and investigating other noise sources and > > implement by at least two vendors: NXP[2] and TI[3]. > >=20 > > [1] http://www.opensig.org/download/document/218/Advanced_PHY_features_= for_automotive_Ethernet_V1.0.pdf > > [2] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/TJA1100.pdf > > [3] https://www.ti.com/product/DP83TC811R-Q1 > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > > --- >=20 > This looks good to me, there is just one thing I'm not sure about: >=20 > > diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h > > index 59344db43fcb1..950ba479754bd 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/phy.h > > +++ b/include/linux/phy.h > > @@ -706,6 +706,8 @@ struct phy_driver { > > struct ethtool_tunable *tuna, > > const void *data); > > int (*set_loopback)(struct phy_device *dev, bool enable); > > + int (*get_sqi)(struct phy_device *dev); > > + int (*get_sqi_max)(struct phy_device *dev); > > }; > > #define to_phy_driver(d) container_of(to_mdio_common_driver(d), \ > > struct phy_driver, mdiodrv) >=20 > I'm not sure if it's a good idea to define two separate callbacks. It > means adding two pointers instead of one (for every instance of the > structure, not only those implementing them), doing two calls, running > the same checks twice, locking twice, checking the result twice. >=20 > Also, passing a structure pointer would mean less code changed if we > decide to add more related state values later. >=20 > What do you think? >=20 > If you don't agree, I have no objections so >=20 > Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek I have no strong opinion on it. Should I rework it? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | --vqf6y3tx55aruwga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEERBNZvwSgvmcMY/T74omh9DUaUbMFAl7FR5gACgkQ4omh9DUa UbOBnA//S7OEdydITBJi9jg46b/y0goQ+Shliwext7lG0yBj8kcRh7CY10RpRozV avE/EvMXN8D0q2rOwyE8Jlw4zYZPuzuci2lXF1GhfRD28DZZDh9CAqCItK5IaImV o5h14ztFDNFbWbEplYzfYUY+lUJVQVbkbp0P+C1sLiGM0Fvr4QlH9X8hK+paJzh5 xnhcDMIDumLX7dvkWnMRGNr5GEJmjCn9tK3YoBU1vt2eCb0GIV5O3GfG5ej/hi8n ix/wR1Ax1+exMePyCm2iiEkBTDV+FlpphMkbj94KqlzPkZQg78+O/vd1jHZJ3Iao M8SMs6nwcpkB+oGygquO/bhnzTUUv0vYwsuopiVCc6zXxO1jUXWvjmvXW1O9tnF8 15NPv6nGI5H7hYPLM9/nbMwb4VydtFU07ltndvXhU5WrZrDcgNjx+OcexUO726wb iLuh5PMzYYY/uyAzcI4ov7IkUTUufwKGYj3B1isKu6XYOvRAA1x91x1xUerhQM/V oelKB7Wct8dzS3up64CXsmhkWH0AA7ZKpoLRgbcAMeRwdR5UTqHHTqGPc6hCupt5 mHSvrSSKrHcdEPmrr5mV6cbAvvF1opP3eMi0VUO0bPw7Ko5pp08Jky+yY3i4moVZ cYcnlB3Zbi4pW1tMqleezfXz9ja46IgT6W8p+b6Dkm5oqbujj20= =eIn7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vqf6y3tx55aruwga--