Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp877137ybk; Wed, 20 May 2020 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCfldPPiQ56vflZDG2cih4ePhisWDVLeUHF7DhpuZ+VWaN1vUxlvpUo18h2dSPWYNhy2ac X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:4003:: with SMTP id nj3mr897353ejb.527.1590010118376; Wed, 20 May 2020 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590010118; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DEGZYJbcbVOQlWb/dKIUKG44caBGW1ogD50dd9frhjvdgqeiI7TCwMs+bosJOoeyzg mOk/AYGb2KDEeBlsjLpyi14zYgMGvqHEGr6DxaOimevn5qpnS/sr2KRemL3Jm6CkwRw8 fZOlwbBaoixculIHB8TMuTlD1jOZd421I1A+V8X8ZMz1UqGJ7sbUMedc1sWLaEJqKDb3 JgU6kRp8MJ8yoFrDZcMPQ0VA64mXO8DuzzHLnS8Fy46sCikK1cucyr5KQczYENH1BDY2 MbmmdPwwNnne+A3M2b/6lxaB/3DgUqtbahrOAYQ8wOcFe3Qn0EHQ25WtaePfYNgL6pXi d19A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=nZWUNPWY4zRHE8jSldPmJVAcqU97+jNU7T9h3KmJXqc=; b=qY/f8TSrJz1d92+I85Zzo95JyX2PzHrdZERRvb5w8EM1/Q6SPUFfMsitFjnk2q4CIT 44gOmsvhJ95ep9aB15e1drNGo3O1YjlyXL8TkaAVT232MAo9s0Y5/F6tsVMlwbbL0fB1 1Dje0F5W4nI7IGROMgyKa2fC9XYpuld3GySZ2hiAr82q9+vVzq3/YT61pttRRrLC+FId NstEURRTSmG+vYQkUxJQv4oMkw2K7ASjW/OLyNGeYB/tYISSgxEA4hWp15HCg+Ooex/v 1gl5CNF+xeD+a0JKBTEtuNuYUart+x7oBmLUlw3qEVXtown5B1KlXtyCDJF+Pti2/T+9 q3LQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id od24si2406010ejb.691.2020.05.20.14.28.14; Wed, 20 May 2020 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728382AbgETVYq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:46 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:52482 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726619AbgETVYp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 9033 invoked by uid 109); 20 May 2020 21:24:45 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:24:45 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 18461 invoked by uid 111); 20 May 2020 21:24:46 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:46 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:44 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , git-packagers@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Re* [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.27.0-rc1 Message-ID: <20200520212444.GA590699@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20200520193156.GA4700@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:31:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The promotion in Git 2.26 was buried in the "performance & > implementation details" section and not in the backward > compatibility section, so it feels a bit funny to highlight the > reversion. In any case, here is what I prepared (but not committed > yet) Hmm, yeah, that does make it feel funny. I'd argue that it probably would have been worth promoting a bit more in v2.26, but it is obviously too late now. > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] RelNotes: advertise the demotion of protocol v2 What you have here looks fine, but I'd be OK if we just left it as-is, too, given the v2.26 mention. -Peff