Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752075AbWCPERr (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:17:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752164AbWCPERr (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:17:47 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:50656 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752075AbWCPERq (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:17:46 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? From: Mike Galbraith To: gcoady@gmail.com Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Willy Tarreau , Arjan van de Ven , j4K3xBl4sT3r , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com> <1142237867.3023.8.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1142273212.3023.35.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060314062144.GC21493@w.ods.org> <20060314222131.GB3166@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:19:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1142482749.8369.12.camel@homer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 669 Lines: 17 On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +1100, Grant Coady wrote: > > Certainly provides little motivation for testers to provide any > feedback does it not? I've had two threads on sluggish terminal > here performance without resolution. 2.6 feels sluggish, the test > is simple and repeatable, your ridicule does not change that at all. Hmm. You have a testcase that's both simple _and_ repeatable? Cool. What is it? -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/