Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 08:09:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        ": Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] usb: xhci: Change the XHCI link order in the
 Makefile
Message-ID: <20200521060902.GA2352222@kroah.com>
References: <20200512150019.25903-2-alcooperx@gmail.com>
 <20200513122613.GA1023594@kroah.com>
 <7acc2a4c-caab-11e7-7b3f-4176f19c58cf@gmail.com>
 <20200513162723.GF1362525@kroah.com>
 <38ff034d-a84c-2309-a8d5-f344930d9a31@gmail.com>
 <20200513170505.GB1369204@kroah.com>
 <20200513173920.GA2862@rowland.harvard.edu>
 <c0642cf4-1436-aec4-96fd-355a897f6418@gmail.com>
 <CAOGqxeU=LjAmAYR9wGeKZo_eLj+ehkrANTM+04E7xWNAp82EJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOGqxeV_9LpFudC3VuFPAOmYVYBQGJ+s01HCK2nP6XxpprK2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOGqxeV_9LpFudC3VuFPAOmYVYBQGJ+s01HCK2nP6XxpprK2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:29:45PM -0400, Alan Cooper wrote:
> Greg, Alan,
> 
> The other 4 related patches were accepted into usb-next and I just
> realized that this one didn't make it. This patch will not fix the
> "insmod out of order" issue, but will help our controllers work with
> some poorly behaved USB devices when the drivers are builtin.

As it doesn't solve the real issue, I did not accept this so that you
all can continue to work on creating a real solution that works for both
situations (built in and as modules.)

I thought I said that already...

thanks,

greg k-h