Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: +ybOD1RMM+pnamZpMlQhx5pyKpDsVA4bUjNqGl93EZ25QOh6KO8kEz6RGw3bpz1ozPFcPFTAMe
 W0yI9yRukN1Q==
IronPort-SDR: Lctipwjy10ADkgk+KPH2ghdvELhfA1XPXfoH87Hxjm7JiX00WoBPlneW7usHOfpG0ZhBXRw/iV
 xdbRbECBOLwg==
Reply-To: vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: spi: Add schema for Cadence QSPI
 Controller driver
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com
References: <20200520123612.11797-1-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
 <20200520124329.GF4823@sirena.org.uk>
 <fd086da7-7e18-83bc-d423-56095b0cff96@linux.intel.com>
 <20200521105646.GA4770@sirena.org.uk>
 <24b0297c-5c33-f690-9514-68b76fc2c9ea@linux.intel.com>
 <20200521122035.GB4770@sirena.org.uk>
From:   "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <463b24a4-0a6a-9fcf-7eb9-8fde602c0c13@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 20:34:43 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200521122035.GB4770@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mark,

On 21/5/2020 8:20 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:14:04PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> On 21/5/2020 6:56 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> That doesn't address either of the issues.  The removal of the old
>>> bindings and addition of the YAML ones needs to be in a single patch
>>> doing that conversion.  What I'm suggesting should be done separately is
>>> whatever changes to the semantics of the bindings you are (according to
>>> your changelog) doing.
> 
>> You mean semantics of the binding as a single patch you are suggesting me,
>> right? , Thanks!
> 
> I mean that any changes to the bindings ought to be split out into
> separate patches, if there's multiple changes it may make sense for
> there to be multiple patches.
Got it, we do not have multiple changes since it is new YAML file.
in case if we feel anything to be added , we add as separate patches.
Thanks!

Regards
Vadivel

>