Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752333AbWCPKqc (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:46:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752335AbWCPKqb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:46:31 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:39320 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752333AbWCPKqb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:46:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:46:30 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Con Kolivas Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Stefan Seyfried , Jun OKAJIMA , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Mohr Subject: Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Message-ID: <20060316104630.GA9399@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200603101704.AA00798@bbb-jz5c7z9hn9y.digitalinfra.co.jp> <20060315103711.GA31317@suse.de> <20060315175948.GB2423@ucw.cz> <200603162133.26771.kernel@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603162133.26771.kernel@kolivas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1696 Lines: 39 > On Thursday 16 March 2006 04:59, Pavel Machek wrote: > > (It will probably suck. In such case, testing Con's patch would be > > nice -- after trivial fix rafael pointed out). > > Ok here's a patch I've booted and tested with a modification to swap prefetch > that others might find useful, not just swsusp. > > The tunable in /proc/sys/vm/swap_prefetch is now bitwise ORed: > 1 = Normal background swap prefetching when load is light > 2 = Aggressively swap prefetch as much as possible > > And once the "aggressive" bit is set it will prefetch as much as it can and > then disable the aggressive bit. Thus if you set this value to 3 it will > prefetch aggressively and then drop back to the default of 1. This makes it > easy to simply set the aggressive flag once and forget about it. I've booted > and tested this feature and it's working nicely. Where exactly you'd set this > in your resume scripts I'm not sure. A rolled up patch against 2.6.16-rc6-mm1 > is here for simplicity: > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/swap-prefetch/2.6.16-rc6-mm1-swap_prefetch_suspend_test.patch > > and the incremental on top of the 4 patches pending for the next -mm is below. > > Comments and testers most welcome. Looks okay, but... what happens if I set /proc/sys/vm/swap_prefetch to "2"? Do nothing but do it agresively? Maybe having 0 = off, 1 = normal, 2 = aggressive would be less error prone for the users. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/