Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 17:03:42 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc:     Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs
Message-ID: <20200522000342.GG11847@yoga>
References: <20200521001006.2725-1-s-anna@ti.com>
 <5f84465e-8f63-51b4-4758-59c85d3ad597@ti.com>
 <20200521190141.GN408178@builder.lan>
 <20200521222334.GA11366@xps15>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200521222334.GA11366@xps15>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu 21 May 15:23 PDT 2020, Mathieu Poirier wrote:

> Gents,
> 
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:01:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 21 May 11:59 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > 
> > > On 5/20/20 7:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > 
> > > > The following is v2 of the K3 DSP remoteproc driver supporting the C66x DSPs
> > > > on the TI K3 J721E SoCs. The patches are based on the latest commit on the
> > > > rproc-next branch, 7dcef3988eed ("remoteproc: Fix an error code in
> > > > devm_rproc_alloc()").
> > > 
> > > I realized I also had the R5F patches on my branch, so the third patch won't
> > > apply cleanly (conflict on Makefile). Let me know if you want a new revision
> > > posted for you to pick up the series.
> > > 
> > 
> > That should be fine, thanks for the heads up!
> > 
> > Will give Mathieu a day or two to take a look as well.
> 
> I don't see having the time to review this set before the middle/end of next
> week.  I also understand we are crunched by time if we want to get this in
> for the upcoming merge window.
> 
> If memory serves me well there wasn't anything controversial about this work.
> Under normal circumstances I'd give it a final look but I trust Suman to have
> carried out what we agreed on.
> 
> Bjorn - if you are happy with this set then go ahead and queue it.
> 

Thanks Mathieu.

I looked through the patches again and saw that we're still waiting for
a ack on the dt binding, so I guess I need to hold off on this a little
bit longer.

Regards,
Bjorn