Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 10:16:38 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc:     Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree Compiler <devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Manikandan Elumalai <manikandan.hcl.ers.epl@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>, Vijay Khemka <vkhemka@fb.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the aspeed tree
Message-ID: <20200522101638.052bd0a2@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <CACPK8Xd4651vtBTbBoGk0G7daunmF2CCOsDZ-ceto7Yu6A5z5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200507091008.1bd38185@canb.auug.org.au>
        <CACPK8XfOJqj=E4JwQsZWvAsp7cv=bjqj2twZk0=MR+ZJQP1nqQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <CACPK8XcUydETZvJEkWPvLnLXatAg3D-MfA1yeDzE0epc-hisJQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <CAL_JsqJWXH4JMZgRQa9r_aPLW6Muz6BRtf_NmeqJv21Aefji1A@mail.gmail.com>
        <CACPK8Xd4651vtBTbBoGk0G7daunmF2CCOsDZ-ceto7Yu6A5z5g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/DcFF.Emc/VDOSRZyZQaAlh_";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/DcFF.Emc/VDOSRZyZQaAlh_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

On Wed, 20 May 2020 07:56:36 +0000 Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 15:19, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 1:40 AM Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote: =20
> > >
> > > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 23:13, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote: =20
> > > >
> > > > Hi Rob,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 23:10, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au=
> wrote: =20
> > > > >
> > > > > After merging the aspeed tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > > > multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning: =20
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Stephen.
> > > > =20
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:126.11-130.4=
: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@80/ipmb1@10: I2C bus=
 unit address format error, expected "40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:128.3-30: Wa=
rning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@80/ipmb1@10:reg: I2C add=
ress must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:137.11-141.4=
: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@100/ipmb3@10: I2C bu=
s unit address format error, expected "40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:139.3-30: Wa=
rning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@100/ipmb3@10:reg: I2C ad=
dress must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:148.11-152.4=
: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@180/ipmb5@10: I2C bu=
s unit address format error, expected "40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:150.3-30: Wa=
rning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@180/ipmb5@10:reg: I2C ad=
dress must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:159.11-163.4=
: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@300/ipmb7@10: I2C bu=
s unit address format error, expected "40000010"
> > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dts:161.3-30: Wa=
rning (i2c_bus_reg): /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c-bus@300/ipmb7@10:reg: I2C ad=
dress must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000010" =20
> > > >
> > > > These are IPMB nodes with the SLAVE_ADDRESS bit set:
> > > >
> > > > +&i2c5 {
> > > > +       //Host3 IPMB bus
> > > > +       status =3D "okay";
> > > > +       multi-master;
> > > > +       ipmb5@10 {
> > > > +               compatible =3D "ipmb-dev";
> > > > +               reg =3D <(0x10 | I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS)>;
> > > > +               i2c-protocol;
> > > > +       };
> > > >
> > > > This is a correct entry, so dtc should not warn about it. =20
> > >
> > > I sent a patch for dtc here:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200508063904.60162-1-joel@jms.id.au/ =
=20
> >
> > Patches for dtc need to be against upstream dtc. There's already a
> > similar patch posted for it which I commented on and never saw a
> > respin. =20
>=20
> Can I suggest some instructions in scsripts/dtc explaining that you
> don't take patches in the kernel tree for this code?
>=20
> I've sent the patch so it applies to the dtc tree. It would be good to
> see that change propagate over to -next as others have reported this
> warning.

These warnings now appear in the arm-soc tree.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/DcFF.Emc/VDOSRZyZQaAlh_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl7HGeYACgkQAVBC80lX
0Gwm/gf/UiP3XqMc4FaiRIxc5sp/aEjFR3Yms5szHXC52VDyyQAv8DBKcjV6wFbC
6tANr+Lqsuu7loczGa7pvqcY7VdBlgk7dLKMDpQdVkgT0qcjiXYLp4w6hDJQO8vk
+9ajzo1pJTIzTRV+b2AOOguhqsZyD/KzRqvkIU7EJW7WwKRFzPpQ9es70thQmSbG
dMNZovADYWZEFGo/hpfnKlEmcdo0X3B5yzB4atAqrlaI4Y9JPDSaUiPney+V8uTP
8bjHyyk9Q9COdJOLqb5NPbK1WUWpXPWnqwTQI1fO7hRqaBx8Zopw8rc1DdW1NDbQ
dmsqJlupAoog2jtPrusX7Ok7b7s8bA==
=Gt6l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/DcFF.Emc/VDOSRZyZQaAlh_--