Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp1948409ybk; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:42:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjdH2mHYYXPkOZgAY3Yyro5nONV7qQCT507SPOVh8YzkxrYrUQoFT8qbeOBAzgQt0UEXtb X-Received: by 2002:a50:99de:: with SMTP id n30mr1458495edb.248.1590118970774; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:42:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590118970; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YiOzbU6V0TYVYk7YSKV26fVdOYLfBpmtb4qW5jH795r56V8D9yDTmCbV8lWGzfoenq GQAas4yG/aj2M/ulDvKxOSHRg1flc8X6mhnTogeJfgZEFGlEoZxc8KQ5WltoINrgyBv9 34rKSP9FWFiMSvqyyMTrbMFmfsOvEkAqaW2JGhmXmaoZazqQ4pyklYALjtliCEPCcIEe RFZHgSOqZoE8xYvD9mqbt3wXa2yGIzVCWFSd1NCROq0aTOHeHYk0T/O1+W9J0hWzBQZY LhepfCAzoIqKAuP0Iywm2n5V/o0LYNXqxJMFuoAPoVFtpl6ppU/rI6D0x2YI/hZZNgXF dJFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=qFLXCugzeSeZG/oguQx0KvAe+oJa+9XQHE4LisOwGA4=; b=zLtjntjM/LBN578utb4dLvjdACWKrQSBSOc8uO+kWYCDS1FEdBw0kLdSo4aiMafXsD NGi/yowrqPWTW3Uose7zcaGPgkYyeOZjASpORRigFCqKmU6DNVaCBUqGlGDEmj2obwte xPpOekF1RZBb+0hteOOzg1Ekiaa2MU5RCDo/A9BAvjVElvL+2kmj9pcClf/iIDpdOtMw jic6opgXyPUrIpVUD2/nfC84ae7FziYoCKzhvlRkdXwcZb7nAHURPrby76yW0qt8HrBs tHeBzrA5lNU3+k6zDq3cvBd3Cv8fPxQFFgBHcaeJnSkqnsrgapsym0uWRcYrMt0Mhd58 hShA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt20si5882124ejc.24.2020.05.21.20.42.28; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728175AbgEVDlF (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 May 2020 23:41:05 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:4888 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727936AbgEVDlE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 23:41:04 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7EF29B06DAA200E1A48D; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:40:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ibm.site (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:40:49 +0800 From: Xiongfeng Wang To: , CC: , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] CPPC: add support for SW BOOST Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:34:36 +0800 Message-ID: <1590118476-28742-3-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1590118476-28742-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> References: <1590118476-28742-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we need to get the max frequency of boost mode and non-boost mode. ACPI spec 6.2 section 8.4.7.1 describe the following two CPC registers. "Highest performance is the absolute maximum performance an individual processor may reach, assuming ideal conditions. This performance level may not be sustainable for long durations, and may only be achievable if other platform components are in a specific state; for example, it may require other processors be in an idle state. Nominal Performance is the maximum sustained performance level of the processor, assuming ideal operating conditions. In absence of an external constraint (power, thermal, etc.) this is the performance level the platform is expected to be able to maintain continuously. All processors are expected to be able to sustain their nominal performance state simultaneously." To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we can use Highest Performance as the max performance in boost mode and Nominal Performance as the max performance in non-boost mode. If the Highest Performance is greater than the Nominal Performance, we assume SW BOOST is supported. The current CPPC driver does not support SW BOOST and use 'Highest Performance' as the max performance the CPU can achieve. 'Nominal Performance' is used to convert 'performance' to 'frequency'. That means, if firmware enable boost and provide a value for Highest Performance which is greater than Nominal Performance, boost feature is enabled by default. Because SW BOOST is disabled by default, so, after this patch, boost feature is disabled by default even if boost is enabled by firmware. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index bda0b24..257d726 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ * requested etc. */ static struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data; +static bool boost_supported; struct cppc_workaround_oem_info { char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1]; @@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * Section 8.4.7.1.1.5 of ACPI 6.1 spec) */ policy->min = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.lowest_nonlinear_perf); - policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf); /* * Set cpuinfo.min_freq to Lowest to make the full range of performance @@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * nonlinear perf */ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.lowest_perf); - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf); policy->transition_delay_us = cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(cpu_num); policy->shared_type = cpu->shared_type; @@ -343,6 +344,13 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) cpu->cur_policy = policy; + /* + * If 'highest_perf' is greater than 'nominal_perf', we assume CPU Boost + * is supported. + */ + if (cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf > cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf) + boost_supported = true; + /* Set policy->cur to max now. The governors will adjust later. */ policy->cur = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); @@ -410,6 +418,32 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) return cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t0, fb_ctrs_t1); } +static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) +{ + struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata; + int ret; + + if (!boost_supported) { + pr_err("BOOST not supported by CPU or firmware\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + cpudata = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; + if (state) + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, + cpudata->perf_caps.highest_perf); + else + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, + cpudata->perf_caps.nominal_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max; + + ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, .verify = cppc_verify_policy, @@ -417,6 +451,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) .get = cppc_cpufreq_get_rate, .init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init, .stop_cpu = cppc_cpufreq_stop_cpu, + .set_boost = cppc_cpufreq_set_boost, .name = "cppc_cpufreq", }; -- 1.7.12.4