Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 10:33:46 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
        Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] remoteproc: add support for a new 64-bit trace
 version
Message-ID: <20200522173346.GJ11847@yoga>
References: <20200325204701.16862-1-s-anna@ti.com>
 <20200325204701.16862-4-s-anna@ti.com>
 <20200521180417.GJ408178@builder.lan>
 <997d6f9a-64ba-7a89-e909-9a5a474120b0@ti.com>
 <f15b0c6d-eee8-b839-0c79-a5316dbbfa7b@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <f15b0c6d-eee8-b839-0c79-a5316dbbfa7b@ti.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri 22 May 09:54 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> On 5/21/20 2:42 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> > 
> > On 5/21/20 1:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Wed 25 Mar 13:47 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
[..]
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
[..]
> > > > +struct fw_rsc_trace2 {
> > > 
> > > Sounds more like fw_rsc_trace64 to me - in particular since the version
> > > of trace2 is 1...
> > 
> > Yeah, will rename this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +??? u32 padding;
> > > > +??? u64 da;
> > > > +??? u32 len;
> > > > +??? u32 reserved;
> > > 
> > > What's the purpose of this reserved field?
> > 
> > Partly to make sure the entire resource is aligned on an 8-byte, and
> > partly copied over from fw_rsc_trace entry. I guess 32-bits is already
> > large enough of a size for trace entries irrespective of 32-bit or
> > 64-bit traces, so I doubt if we want to make the len field also a u64.
> 
> Looking at this again, I can drop both padding and reserved fields, if I
> move the len field before da. Any preferences/comments?
> 

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Bjorn