Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964853AbWCPUvN (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:51:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964856AbWCPUvM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:51:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:53952 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964853AbWCPUvM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:51:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:50:56 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: signal_cache slab corruption. Message-ID: <20060316205056.GA11091@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel References: <20060313181524.GA26234@redhat.com> <20060314170153.GB32080@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1039 Lines: 23 On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:29:08PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > I'd be interested in the signal_cache line from your /proc/slabinfo, > to see what cachep->num is usually in your configuration. But it's > an idle interest: I won't have anything interesting to say, whatever > it is... after 3 days of uptime on a slightly newer kernel.. signal_cache 134 143 696 11 2 : tunables 32 16 8 : slabdata 13 13 0 : globalstat 98892 176 173 156 0 0 129 940 : cpustat 19802 17821 36683 2 the other had seen a little more abuse. These last three days, that box has been quite idle most of the time, whereas the box that crashed was my workhorse for most of last week. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/