Received: by 2002:a25:1104:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 4csp606304ybr; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:34:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmv8WvKOMIQxhKHLfZcz/xepNvQpn6bbMsXpWgOBTVViB0CMWWlBSr/OIV8deQ0N7Et5JD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:84cf:: with SMTP id f15mr9807805ejy.185.1590183287098; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:34:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590183287; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=El/g6/EuDPWFZpEPPb6Tc74uScnv8RjgT1A7dQ6QbVtir/DZSxxf8YvbIn4m1zsM7A xc9cKDBDlg3cjeISDfYAk1KeJgGn038W4iC7KPAmkMMSG2v5+YVQdfDdG2bHCIObvj0c XQaodo78oSoiV+C6XfV4pRJdDeEfTgpbUASyngRiArUQ5UrhA3e2ZHy3eGADu/lQYhIy OjGl2BflIVrFQU80txeJv5tEuplFljmLCZZKoen8Jq9LPpu4YU0Ns9HGWiRHAx9wigRc wjWvIdLEpbt6Nq7iBwtAhQH5ejQR/NsbNmxMXNEMxdplJ9sdqS/g7dvoEJvILC09BdZ7 AdfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=LXXM+2wH3rq6AtktKkvXPQakw4M/1EL37e6NGuPac0Q=; b=wcDxGwgHW68idMkAnkYUkh7f3m3LNMFWIwKuSUFPh0UFdsc1QT2E+Qym0eVHxVhNns iZ8zt56ZMCZWbikvCqZD3FlSdiVxKI2rLus30Sva2fogaXJ2/2QIyTVl1uGQhBpD2ii8 gbUn0VIIHK6igEKfmzPZvY+C3uCRWLcncMZ0Vctqyge/20sJPBQdoHCNCBCShHCv7cZE YMHjLbuo3G9EWkdSopiinoomBiaOUv9gkKar6shVQ+I1XdcKqO3KWwKniGQHHiMTnL99 +N8mfy7Wmlx+ou1E8RlI9rQUbqXt8eZvA/C/+4n3C7BcZ6m4vKiMjhMq7lWMCDXHbTYL Sh9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p2si5185304edm.289.2020.05.22.14.34.25; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731270AbgEVVby (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 May 2020 17:31:54 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:42348 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731145AbgEVVbM (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2020 17:31:12 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9267C13A1; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com (mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com [10.118.28.62]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8B6DE3F68F; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeremy Linton To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com, calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Linton Subject: [RFC 04/11] net: phy: Handle c22 regs presence better Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 16:30:52 -0500 Message-Id: <20200522213059.1535892-5-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200522213059.1535892-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20200522213059.1535892-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Until this point, we have been sanitizing the c22 regs presence bit out of all the MMD device lists. This is incorrect as it causes the 0xFFFFFFFF checks to incorrectly fail. Further, it turns out that we want to utilize this flag to make a determination that there is actually a phy at this location and we should be accessing it using c22. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c index f0761fa5e40b..2d677490ecab 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c @@ -689,9 +689,6 @@ static int get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int dev_addr, return -EIO; *devices_in_package |= phy_reg; - /* Bit 0 doesn't represent a device, it indicates c22 regs presence */ - *devices_in_package &= ~BIT(0); - return 0; } @@ -742,6 +739,8 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, int i; const int num_ids = ARRAY_SIZE(c45_ids->device_ids); u32 *devs = &c45_ids->devices_in_package; + bool c22_present = false; + bool valid_id = false; /* Find first non-zero Devices In package. Device zero is reserved * for 802.3 c45 complied PHYs, so don't probe it at first. @@ -770,6 +769,10 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, return 0; } + /* Bit 0 doesn't represent a device, it indicates c22 regs presence */ + c22_present = *devs & BIT(0); + *devs &= ~BIT(0); + /* Now probe Device Identifiers for each device present. */ for (i = 1; i < num_ids; i++) { if (!(c45_ids->devices_in_package & (1 << i))) @@ -778,6 +781,13 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, ret = _get_phy_id(bus, addr, i, &c45_ids->device_ids[i], true); if (ret < 0) return ret; + if (valid_phy_id(c45_ids->device_ids[i])) + valid_id = true; + } + + if (!valid_id && c22_present) { + *phy_id = 0xffffffff; + return 0; } *phy_id = 0; return 0; -- 2.26.2