Received: by 2002:a25:2c96:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s144csp518196ybs; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:25:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+9aJgQr2GvlkW5yoG8Wjbbg8SRBp0Q+//8agR5IOZtJ71QRwKQaxlwi+X4WG4ePKX2Xq2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1746:: with SMTP id d6mr10695193eje.34.1590348301822; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:25:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590348301; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UQUUQ/JEVT3xr4DvKYL5BIoW26MYcekHbC/eFfjNtjZHXZptuz3Vz0kBzS7Ufivokq MClpWHGcGC1sQqFwPkjB5ALHgmDOb58bd7gSyoVBhaRlds51da0lqdnPrGpg6mXJLE40 xCrHRELi/KGYVZM3aj2K3hts1oXDJRItz0qRcYRIITPIxZonsZIhG0ro6IgiUVF9ZnFu 1Yke0y2DeXAjLrxVyx3aQx+NEgKM//O15rCl9kpHaW9TS11C0uypBWdg5G5cHr6+MdZA GCCgT9RAk1Mr4yCyr7HpIdqjlI+PEumgg5Cfc2KtSSpLb5NH6SGmsWId/ZwPkDr+K0TR jlRg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=kF6sqIhK1kfWOOpnyDDaJ/ad9nyWKxvOfw+GwZJVlBw=; b=SFrsj2RQ5nZ6FLLjysA/tl8FHoOR7heHHplU4lNRlCn6xwQ/JAHOTzjTGMMI2/MLIX p2+UudF42mtpsgrfvTeu1MjFtLkt7cpPbKk9zKX9dngyZ3sxt0OzLR9gnjENArFDyXoV X5Xlij2XkKEAPAnPOtDpRHKmT+JT3+3yPTORxxtCTVWaQHn5ORBhsFaLGcWyrDXyXJ+c nEVVdBp0MQN5AjlcK3EbVnoEIffr4AbY/+HG5hkUlxOFY9livZWze5r3M1ueS9Dg8ebA WY/J41GjK6Zpd88gABWA1uI+UBOQ+GvUyOoP3VPU6R2Nx0WbWUAi4UIenKLFTICZOUVF wVUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gwUf5uPg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qq25si8609240ejb.173.2020.05.24.12.24.39; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gwUf5uPg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388297AbgEXTWg (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 24 May 2020 15:22:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36978 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388254AbgEXTW3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2020 15:22:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1577C05BD43 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id m1so1528851pgk.1 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kF6sqIhK1kfWOOpnyDDaJ/ad9nyWKxvOfw+GwZJVlBw=; b=gwUf5uPgRtpjmEmdekl/X9t1p9KbSX8a5FZv451K+HmJ+E2Dxys7Iv+FahH6uXL921 Rl0Y5qaKfAJ0eZcvKH/3dgpG1oRJgXwwEQ7iU6vxiUjCHxy0LS/4Ic8jVU2Eu3LjGmN+ rldYhIDm4b83DiavFv7abtxG5uSAqnGPy1LA2qmghBtOgoOmXtFwoiT5QoL4RP+GyKi5 1QI5nAo9rFdzTXerS1E2gsghoGegqw49q0HHU6kI2nExtUVM3eLuYmzJ1n/wMbwh8yfT eVLUkBm32Dohxe4j71zdA/Dwmp7n/74hzA14Gx+QYz6Ec4eNIJvrlpSZtpUFZSxOOiyo U7Fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kF6sqIhK1kfWOOpnyDDaJ/ad9nyWKxvOfw+GwZJVlBw=; b=EkbnnliSZU4tuRzGfC2gd8OiBMtqitGs7lgw0fU3L8oW/u+PzlOH22ZnOhmUXzi3OE VU+rC92WT8u4ExbiDgJ8Eh+G8LtKrhX24kW60fgLRxNlDjLieNfsyQ0txU3czEhmkUeN pwMFnGkJZ18PrJXV4b0gTM2RuEa0XBSS+JqHMgX5urNnrsukYKZTF7qkvWEj6b4BnaL+ Uj6891WROZc9nflQbDqZdlMyJwQg8hHW5FCP+3J86jPok/emUBpF9GKdbfYnaLwnwEZA XM6w598XHjnPNFnOLMuMdQSnQ/qn5plMuuaFRV3/jVPCiXEAu88LbkGHXWOyG/jPR3cB ur4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WdndykxAhelMsE996f8bVRbnSGx8Z69KHniYUGFYYCy+Z5hBy njHhebgzxadfyZuX1EBO2ubvqA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5b0e:: with SMTP id p14mr2275730pgb.43.1590348148417; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1.lan ([2605:e000:100e:8c61:c871:e701:52fa:2107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t21sm10312426pgu.39.2020.05.24.12.22.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 May 2020 12:22:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Jens Axboe To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 12/12] io_uring: support true async buffered reads, if file provides it Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 13:22:06 -0600 Message-Id: <20200524192206.4093-13-axboe@kernel.dk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200524192206.4093-1-axboe@kernel.dk> References: <20200524192206.4093-1-axboe@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If the file is flagged with FMODE_BUF_RASYNC, then we don't have to punt the buffered read to an io-wq worker. Instead we can rely on page unlocking callbacks to support retry based async IO. This is a lot more efficient than doing async thread offload. The retry is done similarly to how we handle poll based retry. From the unlock callback, we simply queue the retry to a task_work based handler. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- fs/io_uring.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index e95481c552ff..23073857239c 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -498,6 +498,8 @@ struct io_async_rw { struct iovec *iov; ssize_t nr_segs; ssize_t size; + struct wait_page_queue wpq; + struct callback_head task_work; }; struct io_async_ctx { @@ -2568,6 +2570,112 @@ static int io_read_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, return 0; } +static void io_async_buf_cancel(struct callback_head *cb) +{ + struct io_async_rw *rw; + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx; + struct io_kiocb *req; + + rw = container_of(cb, struct io_async_rw, task_work); + req = rw->wpq.wait.private; + ctx = req->ctx; + + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cqring_fill_event(req, -ECANCELED); + io_commit_cqring(ctx); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + + io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + req_set_fail_links(req); + io_double_put_req(req); +} + +static void io_async_buf_retry(struct callback_head *cb) +{ + struct io_async_rw *rw; + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx; + struct io_kiocb *req; + + rw = container_of(cb, struct io_async_rw, task_work); + req = rw->wpq.wait.private; + ctx = req->ctx; + + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock); + __io_queue_sqe(req, NULL); + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock); +} + +static int io_async_buf_func(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, + int sync, void *arg) +{ + struct wait_page_queue *wpq; + struct io_kiocb *req = wait->private; + struct io_async_rw *rw = &req->io->rw; + struct wait_page_key *key = arg; + struct task_struct *tsk; + int ret; + + wpq = container_of(wait, struct wait_page_queue, wait); + + ret = wake_page_match(wpq, key); + if (ret != 1) + return ret; + + list_del_init(&wait->entry); + + init_task_work(&rw->task_work, io_async_buf_retry); + /* submit ref gets dropped, acquire a new one */ + refcount_inc(&req->refs); + tsk = req->task; + ret = task_work_add(tsk, &rw->task_work, true); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + /* queue just for cancelation */ + init_task_work(&rw->task_work, io_async_buf_cancel); + tsk = io_wq_get_task(req->ctx->io_wq); + task_work_add(tsk, &rw->task_work, true); + } + wake_up_process(tsk); + return 1; +} + +static bool io_rw_should_retry(struct io_kiocb *req) +{ + struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw.kiocb; + int ret; + + /* never retry for NOWAIT, we just complete with -EAGAIN */ + if (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT) + return false; + + /* already tried, or we're doing O_DIRECT */ + if (kiocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_DIRECT | IOCB_WAITQ)) + return false; + /* + * just use poll if we can, and don't attempt if the fs doesn't + * support callback based unlocks + */ + if (file_can_poll(req->file) || !(req->file->f_mode & FMODE_BUF_RASYNC)) + return false; + + /* + * If request type doesn't require req->io to defer in general, + * we need to allocate it here + */ + if (!req->io && __io_alloc_async_ctx(req)) + return false; + + ret = kiocb_wait_page_queue_init(kiocb, &req->io->rw.wpq, + io_async_buf_func, req); + if (!ret) { + get_task_struct(current); + req->task = current; + return true; + } + + return false; +} + static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock) { struct iovec inline_vecs[UIO_FASTIOV], *iovec = inline_vecs; @@ -2601,6 +2709,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock) if (!ret) { ssize_t ret2; +retry: if (req->file->f_op->read_iter) ret2 = call_read_iter(req->file, kiocb, &iter); else @@ -2619,6 +2728,9 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock) if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT) && !file_can_poll(req->file)) req->flags |= REQ_F_MUST_PUNT; + if (io_rw_should_retry(req)) + goto retry; + kiocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_WAITQ; return -EAGAIN; } } -- 2.26.2