Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 13:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2005251101030.24984@pobox.suse.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2005251303430.24984@pobox.suse.cz>
References: <20200522001209.07c19400@canb.auug.org.au> <22332d9b-5e9f-5474-adac-9b3e39861aee@infradead.org> <alpine.LSU.2.21.2005251101030.24984@pobox.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'll try to find out which optimization does this, because it is a 
> slightly different scenario than hiding __noreturn from the callees. 
> Probably -fno-ipa-pure-const again.

And it is indeed -fno-ipa-pure-const again.

Miroslav