Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932074AbWCQLVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:21:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932077AbWCQLVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:21:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:62370 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932074AbWCQLVV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:21:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:18:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Bret Towe" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nfs udp 1000/100baseT issue Message-Id: <20060317031834.43d3c1e6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 18 "Bret Towe" wrote: > > ive seen this on kernels as far back as 2.6.13 on my own machines > (was around that time when i accutally got gigabit at home) > and recently noticed on some thin clients i maintain that 2.4 kernels > on the client side are also affected so perhaps its server side issue? > as all servers ive seen this on are 2.6 i havent used 2.4 kernels in ages > on my own machines so i havent looked into if 2.4 has that issue server side > or not It would be interesting if you could do so. I do recall that nfs-over-crappy-udp was much better behaved in 2.4... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/