Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 10:34:50 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@gmail.com>
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org,
        knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
        sre@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] Add battery charger driver support for MP2629
Message-ID: <20200526093450.GM3628@dell>
References: <20200526090646.25827-1-sravanhome@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20200526090646.25827-1-sravanhome@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 26 May 2020, Saravanan Sekar wrote:

> changes in v12:
>  - added SOB Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

Looks like you added my Acked-by to every patch, when actually I only
Acked the MFD one.  Fortunately, as I'm the one applying these, I can
strip them off, but please be more careful about which *-bys you apply
to which patches in the future.

> changes in v11:
>  - module_remove part replaced by devm_add_action_or_reset in charger patch
>  - minor review comments solved in mfd and adc patch
> 
> I expect, that Lee will provide an immutable branch for me and
> Jonathan once the MFD bits have been reviewed. Please tell me,
> if I should prepare one instead.

I'll do this now.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog