Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp121610ybm; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxZRXLjvsN/ncENEGEfhwPCku64h3sg8DAVed3ZmVLk8GGIKWDBywuBqxrSo3avbkkT028 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1313:: with SMTP id w19mr2617837ejb.79.1590520713677; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590520713; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G+yabGXEGHTklcx7DHtT9SzEK4QbvHZ1LU+7aevW7MslfFOvtHLHio2pYMBTWREeJe FZ0HuK42zAlRexQ/8HLyy/kBVqL3/meS8kP40AeYQ6753TnkthXM/qNxIW2EvJ9xrTt5 NAzP0fxuQuw/qSOvaAI9SWO/57qVsS0IjR8U26mHoKOyxGITGhGp3LyerVrSJUMfxWuu ODo0twBxk45Be+8oNXN8n1Su4w9C03l2kffnsl2LRHYzB7zEeexbkto/WSYY4RQacufQ wvujVPtJZUl/z0asyqrmYEWVWM7Q+hAALsUKh7UWiEXPsw/VTQas4JWkErvkycrjGVv6 P/vA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=EkW3WymmxjQ7QURT48VahzWGmdcPB4O8PLB3oTI7teQ=; b=Y4vzlDJMkBQSMi0DyDP8PA0FTvKXCEJlxGaBd9/hOOD3RyIotfBQ9L2LL+nVMSayiE l+4N4BBeH1M2943obrwItQWRSyJ/V8UD65bi/EGpGVh0zRNOoP4iEk7JyI+LWsUoBHia ZOJ6dTwPqfs/TFw8iMJ2pSu+QR3TT68Qkd6dEllkcrlVJq8jvVV8J5Jhg50IIaDTtMeU QxeKySoXtbt7jJPIIRKSwbBwH3JVhr5jds0DT91stEDEoZAmskV53sPdaRSGXrXyPErq bGnqxV5ItrQwP6O8BLylqMt6EAa3dy2E45zKtKGhsZ1wFg9c67CGbueW8efSXXhfVaNr EcNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=bIqbO9Tq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u21si288851edx.269.2020.05.26.12.18.10; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=bIqbO9Tq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404342AbgEZTOQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 May 2020 15:14:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44804 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392143AbgEZTOJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 15:14:09 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96B9A20776; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590520448; bh=nEsdctgoBHpl4HUz6UKxnPRnw8aRpNQAiRd1il2EC4k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bIqbO9Tqwv9fc7v819nhEw6MWuw6lBcXUbnnkH5hG4VAln3xQsmaek5sA6M7oAYPO btNX5BN4JFnyU6u2kjO24WL67YH5LtZ8s4J1OPwAxsqz9p+UNT84K3LxktL2JkO7jn VKW0n5H2DZoX6JPSA1Fl5ePDSMeAghhb5DcsGxn8= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7ACC23522A8B; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:14:08 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/performance: Fix kfree_perf_init() build warning on 32-bit kernels Message-ID: <20200526191408.GN2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <158923078019.390.12609597570329519463.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20200526182744.GA3722128@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200526182744.GA3722128@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * tip-bot2 for Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > > > The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip: > > > > Commit-ID: f87dc808009ac86c790031627698ef1a34c31e25 > > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f87dc808009ac86c790031627698ef1a34c31e25 > > Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > AuthorDate: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:32:26 -04:00 > > Committer: Paul E. McKenney > > CommitterDate: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:02:50 -07:00 > > > > rcuperf: Add ability to increase object allocation size > > > > This allows us to increase memory pressure dynamically using a new > > rcuperf boot command line parameter called 'rcumult'. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > --- > > kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c > > index a4a8d09..16dd1e6 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c > > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ torture_param(bool, shutdown, RCUPERF_SHUTDOWN, > > torture_param(int, verbose, 1, "Enable verbose debugging printk()s"); > > torture_param(int, writer_holdoff, 0, "Holdoff (us) between GPs, zero to disable"); > > torture_param(int, kfree_rcu_test, 0, "Do we run a kfree_rcu() perf test?"); > > +torture_param(int, kfree_mult, 1, "Multiple of kfree_obj size to allocate."); > > > > static char *perf_type = "rcu"; > > module_param(perf_type, charp, 0444); > > @@ -635,7 +636,7 @@ kfree_perf_thread(void *arg) > > } > > > > for (i = 0; i < kfree_alloc_num; i++) { > > - alloc_ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct kfree_obj), GFP_KERNEL); > > + alloc_ptr = kmalloc(kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!alloc_ptr) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > @@ -722,6 +723,8 @@ kfree_perf_init(void) > > schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); > > } > > > > + pr_alert("kfree object size=%lu\n", kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj)); > > There's a new build warning on certain 32-bit kernel builds due to > this commit: > > In file included from ./include/linux/printk.h:7, > from ./include/linux/kernel.h:15, > from kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c:13: > kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c: In function ‘kfree_perf_init’: > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘unsigned int’ [-Wformat=] > 5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001" /* ASCII Start Of Header */ > | ^~~~~~ > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:9:20: note: in expansion of macro ‘KERN_SOH’ > 9 | #define KERN_ALERT KERN_SOH "1" /* action must be taken immediately */ > | ^~~~~~~~ > ./include/linux/printk.h:295:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘KERN_ALERT’ > 295 | printk(KERN_ALERT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c:726:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘pr_alert’ > 726 | pr_alert("kfree object size=%lu\n", kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj)); > | ^~~~~~~~ > kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c:726:32: note: format string is defined here > 726 | pr_alert("kfree object size=%lu\n", kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj)); > | ~~^ > | | > | long unsigned int > | %u > > > The reason for the warning is that both kfree_mult and sizeof() are > 'int' types on 32-bit kernels, while the format string expects a long. > > Instead of casting the type to long or tweaking the format string, the > most straightforward solution is to upgrade kfree_mult to a long. > Since this depends on CONFIG_RCU_PERF_TEST Makes sense, and I have queued the patch below, which I am assuming that you want in the upcoming merge window. If you don't tell me otherwise, I will send you an urgent pull request later today. Or, if you just put it directly into -tip yourself: Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney Either way, please let me know. > BTW., could we please also rename this code from 'PERF_TEST'/'perf test' > to 'PERFORMANCE_TEST'/'performance test'? At first glance I always > mistakenly believe that it's somehow related to perf, while it isn't. =B-) Fair enough, especially given that perf was there first and is also way more heavily used. ;-) But I am guessing that this one is OK for the v5.9 merge window. Either way, I will update as you say. Thanx, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ commit 2fbc7d67a2ed108e3ac63296670fecb3a42fddd0 Author: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue May 26 12:10:01 2020 -0700 rcuperf: Fix kfree_mult to match printk() format This commit changes the type of kfree_mult from int to long in order to match the printk() format on 32-bit systems. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c index d906ca9..fb3a1f0 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ torture_param(bool, shutdown, RCUPERF_SHUTDOWN, torture_param(int, verbose, 1, "Enable verbose debugging printk()s"); torture_param(int, writer_holdoff, 0, "Holdoff (us) between GPs, zero to disable"); torture_param(int, kfree_rcu_test, 0, "Do we run a kfree_rcu() perf test?"); -torture_param(int, kfree_mult, 1, "Multiple of kfree_obj size to allocate."); +torture_param(long, kfree_mult, 1, "Multiple of kfree_obj size to allocate."); static char *perf_type = "rcu"; module_param(perf_type, charp, 0444);