Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp397144ybm; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:53:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8Fkn1oVEvPSMB5axNt0rHEOwvQRRo2h2I39niqSyPJKiArqMvYVhwYONsE9yOVJgK+FB9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:203a:: with SMTP id ay26mr21647020edb.205.1590551625890; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:53:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590551625; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gHQPIHwR/X0ix8aDIMQprszykZpHYa/p25NgLpWlx5BbGVTgrYgvb9OJ8/JfOvhI6k WMe8qv2MBwZoItYppMO/aNOJ4icOR4fNJ93YqFQhuy1XV9HWHnJX+ma2FU+19wbncEy8 oiPufd+rEIUVn4sQz0HqV71iFYJuQC7DygLDFT07EICAiI+3jh/bO2URgT9yl/kEHMUv UbSg3i7GeTTRftqmvA0go7sa59R1x+xzhnVQUS5N+FPCVf6rt/w9g1Z72JtHBv2d+EEc VAD6oDMYjoygnkIMFRsrr+LsQCJoVmURmdsST4pLgY/I/zcE+ZMfC/1V8x/3uEhE6Rbh Nl1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=JeAQlLbjnTzSsEHohZQ0vJ5FLklCwj2YxNU2h1n7NuQ=; b=zBBlHbh3mG+BRPQUNg/vfb9OIZPZPBwFxGq7IitxAHJgnwJgsPfds+cTC90vfwNDYz 1OojUuRFAhimkOvOYT3cr4r6pPenNnZSHY7o+Q7iYnsz3oMsaSUlcE1DqU/DOXlrzCNT 9WoAJoVzQmOL4DDz08OQQ0ZYtzjFldxLonmOOc6jFFM340NcCaBwIHVIqegSrWUOoGqD 1ScVNq1OOb8HxhOzhwWrFXaLQMHt3vYlday4poWrDHVo8+/V3z+GaORr4S7G56tCd071 NOX8Drjp7gtj12S1m/snHlN8VQaWLC1dd+zI5sDPZBru+w7/kfqvKetqGORp1iYcZdVQ oYdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=NtswoNCN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v13si1110294ejo.418.2020.05.26.20.53.23; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=NtswoNCN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391108AbgEZVTT (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 May 2020 17:19:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54404 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390009AbgEZVTT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 17:19:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C33C061A0F; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id v2so5674365pfv.7; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:19:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JeAQlLbjnTzSsEHohZQ0vJ5FLklCwj2YxNU2h1n7NuQ=; b=NtswoNCNvSHXQHLdhbKDMF4mbwJ4/k4/AYx7avK5d7NkHxwb3TOI3WLyF85XDbUreC rVy3kLeEQLfLUksmXBnThukV4FcIRhvE+wkxyvurL32zr759NbMQqxcbdGqUr/dVFtLJ 5zeai2YcCr0eAOOYhQ/XesR0cJLQKESpnQkpgO/5GK3LkMTagccdrGlzZ96UrwDLTdax vmBS5os3yhzVgL+OS/gSbbT6asxpngAO/kGItaSS0G+lNnm9avs0m034e35M8H02TBxy uYWut7qXhGX6HODzX8vBY6L2o7dUUyk5tauJtINodNTydY75/EqPq8rKZiFVusIT5fID 3Rdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JeAQlLbjnTzSsEHohZQ0vJ5FLklCwj2YxNU2h1n7NuQ=; b=tiiQWv6Dq+d6y+txRDWwHEs0IQM0CsvDMcNR1mU5mCQ67j/LSF7U7tkB28eAJAtxWt sBjyclX3B2JGUnfCyHGyJ2Ou7vey8Dw0cC43q4hdDGHMCyGplkTl1xwX9a3UQP0bBWMw GKlPD5EzMlEbHrvrg4o9cfS2s7HsryNv97wD2hSgYJEbsTiQsj9KgyNgphTLjrb/4NHV RMQfgPEHKbJpfQxx10nRG3kcT0iyud0U+XnO6gYugC93iGRqsqS+Bv3EVhYQa9BORxFv irf4UrN4BOk4j9Zf+r+13aH+HkdnsjGFcoBGdEUL08CofdQHNaS0q/3MMu6zn/qjBedu jjpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gLCUYHRkfJZaCg2mQrKDcRgCBRUlWqDlZdRPLy/jaguFcYTxs prvR2XUzFbnTEhbjcdV4CGhkkfyr X-Received: by 2002:a62:6041:: with SMTP id u62mr699242pfb.62.1590527958496; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.230.188.43] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y5sm369664pff.150.2020.05.26.14.19.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2020 14:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: use more reasonable delays To: Antoine Tenart , davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com References: <20200526162256.466885-1-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20200526162256.466885-2-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: <1941644c-4f10-7480-4195-66e39f9c14d8@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:19:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200526162256.466885-2-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/26/2020 9:22 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote: > The MSCC MIIM MDIO driver uses delays to read poll a status register. I > made multiple tests on a Ocelot PCS120 platform which led me to reduce > those delays. The delay in between which the polling function is allowed > to sleep is reduced from 100us to 50us which in almost all cases is a > good value to succeed at the first retry. The overall delay is also > lowered as the prior value was really way to high, 10000us is large > enough. > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian