Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 0/2] net: hns3: adds two VLAN feature
From:   tanhuazhong <tanhuazhong@huawei.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>
CC:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <salil.mehta@huawei.com>, <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
        <linuxarm@huawei.com>
References: <1590061105-36478-1-git-send-email-tanhuazhong@huawei.com>
 <20200521121707.6499ca6b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
 <20200521.143726.481524442371246082.davem@davemloft.net>
 <cb427604-05ee-504c-03d0-fcce16b3cfcc@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <356be994-7cf9-e7b2-8992-46a70bc6a54b@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 10:31:59 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cb427604-05ee-504c-03d0-fcce16b3cfcc@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2020/5/22 17:35, tanhuazhong wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020/5/22 5:37, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>> Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 12:17:07 -0700
>>
>>> On Thu, 21 May 2020 19:38:23 +0800 Huazhong Tan wrote:
>>>> This patchset adds two new VLAN feature.
>>>>
>>>> [patch 1] adds a new dynamic VLAN mode.
>>>> [patch 2] adds support for 'QoS' field to PVID.
>>>>
>>>> Change log:
>>>> V1->V2: modifies [patch 1]'s commit log, suggested by Jakub Kicinski.
>>>
>>> I don't like the idea that FW is choosing the driver behavior in a way
>>> that's not observable via standard Linux APIs. This is the second time
>>> a feature like that posted for a driver this week, and we should
>>> discourage it.
>>
>> Agreed, this is an unacceptable approach to driver features.
>>
> 
> Hi, Jakub & David.
> 
> As decribed in patch #1, there is a scenario which needs the dynamic
> mode(port VLAN filter is always disabled, andVF VLAN filter is keep
> disable until a non-zero VLAN ID being used for the function).
> 
> Is this mode selection provided through "ethtool --set-priv-flags"
> more acceptable? Or is there any other better suggestion for this?
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Hi, Jakub & David.

For patch#1, is it acceptable adding "ethtool --get-priv-flags"
to query the VLAN. If yes, I will send a RFC for it.

Best Regards.
Thanks.

>> .
>>