Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200414091842.25972-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
 <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2005261023250.25812@cbobk.fhfr.pm> <CAO-hwJ+mTjVpBiY9vHXA2Y6D+cXYemixFJ++i+KwZZ25Z6LHHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <A51B9D28-88BF-42EB-9161-8E3081B128D2@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <A51B9D28-88BF-42EB-9161-8E3081B128D2@canonical.com>
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 11:24:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJJ=_2bn1BEshZ6URT813UAA6KRLaiEHt6bNPUcd9esskg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: multitouch: Remove MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:19 AM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 26, 2020, at 16:43, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:24 AM Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> >>
> >>> After commit c23e2043d5f7 ("HID: multitouch: do not filter mice nodes"),
> >>> MT_CLS_WIN_8 also supports mouse nodes, hence make MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL
> >>> redundant.
> >>>
> >>> Remove MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL accordingly.
> >>
> >> Benjamin, can I get your Ack on this one please?
> >
> > Heh, funny enough I was trying to fix
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207235 and was pondering
> > this one too.
> >
> > To fix #207235, I'll likely need to add a new class and quirk in
> > hid-multitouch. I can't really find a generic solution for now, and we
> > better have a local quirk for the 2 devices we currently have and
> > backport those to stable. However, this patch will likely conflict
> > (trivially), with the new quirks, so I was thinking:
> > - submitting my quick and dirty quirk and mark it to stable
> > - apply this one on top of it (this one really doesn't need to go to stable)
> >
> > How does that sound?
>
> Sounds good. I'll resend this patch once your patch lands in the tree.

Great, thanks. Though I should be able to rebase it and push it
directly. I'll notify you if I can't get to it today.

Cheers,
Benjamin

>
> Kai-Heng
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Benjamin
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jiri Kosina
> >> SUSE Labs
> >>
> >
>