Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750932AbWCRAzV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:55:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751688AbWCRAzV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:55:21 -0500 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140]:10152 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750932AbWCRAzV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:55:21 -0500 From: Rob Landley To: Blaisorblade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] kernel BUG at drivers/block/loop.c:621 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:55:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200603171912.12082.rob@landley.net> <200603180124.19077.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> In-Reply-To: <200603180124.19077.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603171955.38138.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2301 Lines: 58 On Friday 17 March 2006 7:24 pm, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Saturday 18 March 2006 01:12, Rob Landley wrote: > > I can reproduce the following in 2.6.16-rc5, User Mode Linux: > > > > kernel BUG at drivers/block/loop.c:621! > > Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG! > > > > EIP: 0073:[] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:b7de1f9c EFLAGS: > > 00200246 Not tainted > > EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000018be ECX: 00000013 EDX: 000018be > > ESI: 000018bb EDI: 00000011 EBP: b7de1fb8 DS: 007b ES: 007b > > 09b87bb4: [<0806c762>] show_regs+0x102/0x110 > > 09b87bd0: [<0805b6fc>] panic_exit+0x2c/0x50 > > 09b87be0: [<0807ff7d>] notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x50 > > 09b87c00: [<08071095>] panic+0x75/0x120 > > 09b87c20: [<0812e181>] loop_thread+0x151/0x160 > > 09b87c4c: [<08065297>] run_kernel_thread+0x37/0x60 > > 09b87cfc: [<0805bbd1>] new_thread_handler+0x91/0xc0 > > The below is strange - GCC is putting disks in the .text section or > kallsyms has some bug. > > > 09b87d20: [] disks+0xf7e7ec84/0x4 Isn't ffffe??? the FASTCALL page? > > The reproduction sequence is a bit involved (my mount regression test and > > the current svn snapshot of busybox are involved), and running the > > following sequence of commands: > > > > mount; mount -a; mount; mount /dev/loop1 /images/vfat.dir ; > > losetup /dev/loop1; ls; vi /etc/fstab; cat /etc/fstab; losetup > > /dev/loop0; mount /images/vfat.img /images/vfat.dir -o ro > > > > The current busybox mount is still broken in a couple of known places > > (hence the testing; I'm fixing it). But it probably shouldn't panic the > > kernel... > > *) Is this reproducible on host? Haven't tried. I value my laptop. :) My host is running unbuntu 2.6.12, and my mount test requires a clean environment with nothing else mounted when it first runs. (It basically needs to run as PID 1. Among other things, it synthesizes variants of its own fstab...) I don't think it's a uml bug, but I cc'd the UML list because that's where I can easily reproduce it. Rob -- Never bet against the cheap plastic solution. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/