Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:03:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:03:24 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:11602 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:03:14 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Where is it written? In-Reply-To: <20001110184031.A2704@munchkin.spectacle-pond.org> <200011110011.eAB0BbF244111@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20001110192751.A2766@munchkin.spectacle-pond.org> <20001111163204.B6367@inspiron.suse.de> <20001111171749.A32100@wire.cadcamlab.org> Organization: private Linux site, southern Germany Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 16:35:59 +0100 From: Olaf Titz Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Well it's safer if you are lazy about prototyping varargs functions. > But of course by doing that you're treading on thin ice anyway, in > terms of type promotion and portability. So I guess it's much better > to say "varargs functions MUST be prototyped" and use the registers. make -Wmissing-prototypes mandatory :-) Olaf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/