Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp962029ybm; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCbBulCCQaCjbjehRR47WedQ3pAGNGXvgjTvSa0F4EZ2iK9SXsMQyYQfHrFjN3g4y6SUC9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:868f:: with SMTP id g15mr7223919ejx.208.1590607000364; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590607000; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l8LX0vEwS9IRrxHpzR+9eNC3kE63uAMruUoC2UX2RJ44shdM83dYBmLv5lEDnv+6Hz 6UTriOL15n04l0ylp/xTFFCckcnlKre6kLTYVLrmkhnKxRe81irSmIX9d6Ila47MvAlJ TbA0JDUy+iWADTgLySxeBE4MD0dCBPJ1wpFbY1neITDaqpQtuS+0j9+LC0F3V5hFjIB6 c6wAqLRhrQ0OvZTmN1XIFBm0nIfUMB3k01NX+OPvKLjRobaQY7QfE7CwQETpDyvpfuNc R+7YggvTjGsDOQAe5s261eoQZjYeGXaimtrl77Rj09h5qM8SEN9Pg14TVWzyvIwoEyKj j1UA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=soqL+aLJQ94mC33SIvSHCVdyIZoJ3dhQDwVCjjCxaQQ=; b=gXRQXqnQ3mlr+Hx+xwem22VrY/imMnETD/ySGdT6jGiZOakm7R0nMGVws2FWbeJBlr qGQOh8cUdMbMoXnfkOj6XI2Rhc0OHMAlsvkkYicG4r1jwAaV7iX85sMzD6hfMmLxEUYq Ru63s8sbV8vMx1wtviVNJ1dAt6HhDo+rgd2ncsZwVtXop3c0LRcLY/nnABF6klJWi6av jLtM9Bxm2ildDDbP+LIl5krpEcpGxYvwicBWrtYmvf23tC+S0MK915AdrXW7kyRVSVnY yE++Tu5qb77JSLuVEYr6Mf0f5qOsQo1NC4yRbCoNCzOdZC9INFTj/vingldV6ZH9rKBL jHnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SvQpnI9t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a5si2176026edn.81.2020.05.27.12.16.17; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SvQpnI9t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731065AbgE0Q4J (ORCPT + 98 others); Wed, 27 May 2020 12:56:09 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:35022 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731059AbgE0Q4I (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 12:56:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590598567; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=soqL+aLJQ94mC33SIvSHCVdyIZoJ3dhQDwVCjjCxaQQ=; b=SvQpnI9tpwQ0tlRMgNaMn4WDuvMDDDoCbG//9qrBn+w2SflkJFa0yxzJR1jdVDmYx4FExc dZqd8GzJOiKKjsgAaGvbHkIPKYguJKtf1h74woHckMPaKzS+m/e0+XfpVCNRgPzq0Mjn30 4U672neBbjgqlMLqnGIwIoZcdsNcGBM= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-387-tLFKjfxQO8yFzCxE_Yb0UQ-1; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:56:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tLFKjfxQO8yFzCxE_Yb0UQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id n6so3706511wrv.6 for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:56:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=soqL+aLJQ94mC33SIvSHCVdyIZoJ3dhQDwVCjjCxaQQ=; b=DXV7WL3K5GOmfYyK0b72Ok2FYla/YH/ZvqRH+/9x48y0a4Y85s2/Zx2unCiKmrZUcK 6ARXfG2f3aodbSJdL2QQCznCleG3c8ozd5qQTVKnE4lWcFGbLrLg/7Tz4MtWLS1eZah7 pFVx4CtwBRPLaMENedjPj/56T8c4eJ5cIeo9L2UMLxVT8yFBRNDeA6VWeBimBjgzl8HG bCcl+2bZpMBIqqOfpT/JdvddK3hfVYW0hKgNnurfOTS8LChRfuM6nHtJBsO0taBYFCRh qScoDX52recJqXPuJFeHkmLTzU89+z16asemLb3C0qJIxqvXxhjMZcBjwdoxSNEbS3Op ngZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304X9M9EGl1koXTZ7IV3oG/rqYXbbBYnsS3NSAfLTBWyVNYoJLm SZ6BWH8xCTGFH20eRwY4WaKxJYIfgiByVwE3uxjPWJHQdBkcDouEluGXuad7RDjXkmnYrKh6MZg khtrIncyko9QdkPT1Iyn7NR4T X-Received: by 2002:adf:82d0:: with SMTP id 74mr23661151wrc.138.1590598564716; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:56:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:82d0:: with SMTP id 74mr23661135wrc.138.1590598564454; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:3c1c:ffba:c624:29b8? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:3c1c:ffba:c624:29b8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm3351651wrb.14.2020.05.27.09.56.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 May 2020 09:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Initialize tdp_level during vCPU creation To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+904752567107eefb728c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com References: <20200527085400.23759-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <875zch66fy.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200527162318.GD24461@linux.intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 18:56:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200527162318.GD24461@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/05/20 18:23, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Hmm, one option would be to make .get_tdp_level() pure function by passing > in vcpu->arch.maxphyaddr. That should make the comment redundant. I don't > love bleeding VMX's implementation into the prototype, but that ship has > kinda already sailed. Well, it's not bleeding the implementation that much, guest MAXPHYADDR is pretty much the only reason why it's a function and not a constant. Another possibility BTW is to make the callback get_max_tdp_level and make get_tdp_level a function in mmu.c. Paolo