Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:36:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:36:26 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([195.3.98.22]:2566 "HELO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:36:18 -0400 To: Dave McCracken cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Issue with max_threads (and other resources) and highmem In-Reply-To: <72940000.1003868385@baldur> From: Andi Kleen Date: 23 Oct 2001 22:36:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: Dave McCracken's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:19:45 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0700000000000003 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.83) Emacs/20.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <72940000.1003868385@baldur>, Dave McCracken writes: > What's the best approach here? I would just limit it to a reasonable max value; e.g. 10000 if someone needs more than 10000 threads/processes he/she can set sysctls manually. The current scheduler would choke anyways if only a small fraction of 10000 threads are runnable. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/