Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
To:     Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
        kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200525115052.19243-1-kohada.t2@gmail.com>
 <CGME20200525115121epcas1p2843be2c4af35d5d7e176c68af95052f8@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
 <20200525115052.19243-4-kohada.t2@gmail.com>
 <00d301d6332f$d4a52300$7def6900$@samsung.com>
 <d0d2e4b3-436e-3bad-770c-21c9cbddf80e@gmail.com>
 <CAKYAXd9GzYTxjtFuUJe+WjEOHSJnVbOfwn_4ZXZgmiVtjV4z6A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ccb66f50-b275-4717-f165-98390520077b@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 11:00:58 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd9GzYTxjtFuUJe+WjEOHSJnVbOfwn_4ZXZgmiVtjV4z6A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>> II tried applying patch to dev-tree (4c4dbb6ad8e8).
>> -The .patch file I sent
>> -mbox file downloaded from archive
>> But I can't reproduce the error. (Both succeed)
>> How do you reproduce the error?
> I tried to appy your patches in the following order.
> 1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
> 2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector
> 3. [PATCH 2/4] exfat: separate the boot sector analysis
> 4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add boot region verification
> 5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation

I was able to reproduce it.

The dir-cache patch was created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
The 4 patches for boot_sector were also created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
(at physically separated place)

I'm sorry I didn't check any conflicts with these patches.

I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?

BR