Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932831AbWCRP67 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:58:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932139AbWCRP66 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:58:58 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:60232 "EHLO azsmga101-1.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932101AbWCRP64 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:58:56 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.03,106,1141632000"; d="scan'208"; a="13397924:sNHT101152891" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT] Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:58:49 +0800 Message-ID: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F84041AC269@pdsmsx403> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT] Thread-Index: AcZKo4ltkA5MNN/GRTGN2UXItiZGuQAADDAQ From: "Yu, Luming" To: "Sanjoy Mahajan" Cc: , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , "Tom Seeley" , "Dave Jones" , "Jiri Slaby" , , , "Brian Marete" , "Ryan Phillips" , , "Brown, Len" , , "Mark Lord" , "Randy Dunlap" , , "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, "Pavlik Vojtech" , "Meelis Roos" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2006 15:58:50.0693 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9455750:01C64AA4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 33 >> Please try additional ugly hack >> 5. in acpi_os_queue_for_execution: >> if(acpi_in_suspend == YES) >> do nothing. > >Am compiling it. If acpi_in_suspend, I've had it do >return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_PARAMETER). Is there a better error code to >use? I didn't want to use AE_OK, since the caller might think that >the function will be executed eventually, and might do something silly >like wait for it to be executed -- and produce another hang. I didn't >know, but to be safe I wanted to return an error code. just return AE_OK, because we are hacking. :-) The only place that could have issue is in acpi_ev_global_lock_handler, you can add a printk there, then you can know what happened. > >> Also, please add acpi_debug_layer=0x10 acpi_debug_leve=0x10 boot >> option, then you can observe what methods were executed before >> suspend. > >That's in my lilo.conf so all kernels I test use those options. I can >send you the dmesgs from the suspends without the ugly hack (and will >send them from the upcoming suspends, with the ugly hack). Thanks, I'm waiting for that to understand if the hack is clean for killing unwanted AML methods call. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/