Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
To:     "'Tetsuhiro Kohada'" <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Cc:     <kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
        <mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
        <motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
        "'Sungjong Seo'" <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
        "'Namjae Jeon'" <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <ccb66f50-b275-4717-f165-98390520077b@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 14:03:06 +0900
Message-ID: <015401d634ad$4628e4c0$d27aae40$@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AQEl0VwLAqGTGno4seWfP7lwGg+RAAKJW6foAcSd2fUB9WovMgNdMeCFAbRhwtQCDDf9yamyrSRA
Content-Language: ko
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <20200525115052.19243-1-kohada.t2@gmail.com>
        <CGME20200525115121epcas1p2843be2c4af35d5d7e176c68af95052f8@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
        <20200525115052.19243-4-kohada.t2@gmail.com>
        <00d301d6332f$d4a52300$7def6900$@samsung.com>
        <d0d2e4b3-436e-3bad-770c-21c9cbddf80e@gmail.com>
        <CAKYAXd9GzYTxjtFuUJe+WjEOHSJnVbOfwn_4ZXZgmiVtjV4z6A@mail.gmail.com>
        <ccb66f50-b275-4717-f165-98390520077b@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> >> II tried applying patch to dev-tree (4c4dbb6ad8e8).
> >> -The .patch file I sent
> >> -mbox file downloaded from archive
> >> But I can't reproduce the error. (Both succeed) How do you reproduce
> >> the error?
> > I tried to appy your patches in the following order.
> > 1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
> > 2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector 3. [PATCH 2/4]
> > exfat: separate the boot sector analysis 4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add
> > boot region verification 5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum
> > calculation
> 
> I was able to reproduce it.
> 
> The dir-cache patch was created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
> The 4 patches for boot_sector were also created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
> (at physically separated place)
> 
> I'm sorry I didn't check any conflicts with these patches.
> 
> I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
> If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?
I will apply them after testing at once if you send updated 5 patches again.
Thanks!
> 
> BR