Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp325824ybm; Thu, 28 May 2020 03:54:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztrdALc4qdKYp+dlA1TzFnHNLBnCdA+64hHsEXgmJAhS3AKmxhAlKDB3Cyj2HL+5aHYmRN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:81d7:: with SMTP id e23mr2450217ejx.462.1590663245102; Thu, 28 May 2020 03:54:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590663245; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mfQe5W79RZz0pfNMG9h+hY3TL47MqepGgbMKFDAouw2wzFg//lpHoAPpsh5VM0Wfwm l0incuqmH+8Op04JiiOqQCtSddU2EtnCqBoyzEbtIbU78oVVDril9xSz6rPtJwzU5ufc M0wgwcZpIA6jub71raIa+wziAhc7q7b0XQDC6uYAqyZ7gyUisnFhhxQ+ySeztKXfdxee jiVgDZEbF6H9CyunFqwVe5DILmiwJCg4WfO9A5nz7wqE9nZ92BITdUQIAIV9HCm5blgo 2WJ+Vp4V4hc3r2LkSS0eueGpUK7CgdbfuMiVuqp6kW+4s3wPwlsjF77Ko7rHEDTrE5n+ uDGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=hgsbWFTFRa7V/NvC1LMIAVfvjxlpp+elvkKIVGlbGSc=; b=tbeC27Kkd8Zwf9wsYLvXQV+JmNDDpBYCn9e4pVUJMZt1n9VhhObe2AYVgA5Z7ZmIDv 24iTYqBxKOexPS2RR7BE+30Pb+EdL5JZa4do6OjGb+VC1kPJp386zi5f3VO8LsxNTPIm oWHSvsJ/H/+9vZSKOdjs5Ekkz3uVsp6oVR6zvID5e9Gy4aDQcI2Uue8qhbTGgau8efK0 MEgIJmRBJB58AaaG5L5X9hWcCZ/cTvvpPskIaa+Cr+OpWp9jYj3HFM6bH9ocmFXJhHE9 vq4p0Uh/rw6D8VjPYv+iOW4JgNZgGC5PqNAhQZLrmhVAKkAn6hEq1RBLFAw0slVWAgWP 0TUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=mFy4UDTe; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=QoqKY70q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g4si3975779edn.285.2020.05.28.03.53.42; Thu, 28 May 2020 03:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=mFy4UDTe; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=QoqKY70q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388017AbgE1KtZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 May 2020 06:49:25 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:44067 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387956AbgE1KtX (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 06:49:23 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFFA5C00B7; Thu, 28 May 2020 06:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 May 2020 06:49:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=hgsbWFTFRa7V/NvC1LMIAVfvjxl pp+elvkKIVGlbGSc=; b=mFy4UDTebigc5WdHzbN+ysdAEd9SzN1hZd5rTSlxiYU YwWzfl3rRlFGkgHypoPHwI9F9wpJ750OAVDflYyc/a1gGjuMUPVLUjaayhssabfU z+a8cO3v0sKiMNSTsnr/02UQGUkA6dp5tp/yAo+8TIaQwR3SigLDLrW6RwBfGhhv qsC2+J7rHM+vMraokDdddXAg5ANqVm+ToHR9hMCfW1ggRWoZK0vKbjiE+FhRkinR Z7SusOoLKMbp4tRO+QsvW8g93xrd1ercWSEKxtUJU7pWyBDJd1Aj4eSQ5pXf48QG KDPnqdJjoMDRWRGVM/9TiOqzhfbbJuB+2keup9L7PvA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hgsbWF TFRa7V/NvC1LMIAVfvjxlpp+elvkKIVGlbGSc=; b=QoqKY70quHd0OfCgn3hQS1 tCa0N6TwSlnmYRwe2IudTorvpIlf3FWZceEUuzHW5yABTd6b8Kvy2Lq3yYfpt9Ob 62c8LMYT0yKJBkICwX0MiptO1qGiyO7H93yrfpzc0k2qvui9M9UKrwAVb5WvblSt z9a3aRa2sILBuSKG26YbXJ6GFfY9fQFF2qWpCdOq2scP9/Qp+yY7TMnfLZyiEShm fbErAa1hIma/CpBh3qWFHWZZ6gebVN1/uzdZgMr/0d1cpveaTs/Ly3RMf2tQA/op ZD74L9hUpsM2juBeL4goRPDaq1z7i9ZNtyxEKW0Bg0tT1wGHu2VlVFlwLkUEkTfw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddviedgudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcu mffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevueehje fgfffgiedvudekvdektdelleelgefhleejieeugeegveeuuddukedvteenucfkphepkeef rdekiedrkeelrddutdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 00C843061DC5; Thu, 28 May 2020 06:49:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:49:16 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rob Herring , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sandeep Maheswaram , Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree Message-ID: <20200528104916.GD3115014@kroah.com> References: <20200528162215.3a9aa663@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200528162215.3a9aa663@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:22:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml > > between commit: > > 3828026c9ec8 ("dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Convert USB DWC3 bindings") > > from the devicetree tree and commits: > > cd4b54e2ae1f ("dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Convert USB DWC3 bindings") > > from the usb tree. > > I fixed it up (I guessed, taking most changes from the former) and can > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. Sounds good,t hanks. greg k-h