Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750903AbWCRU5O (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:57:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750974AbWCRU5O (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:57:14 -0500 Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt ([193.136.128.21]:18071 "EHLO smtp1.ist.utl.pt") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750902AbWCRU5O (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:57:14 -0500 From: Claudio Martins To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 20:57:09 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Avuton Olrich , Nathan Scott , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060317143642.GJ3914@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20060317143642.GJ3914@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603182057.10171.ctpm@ist.utl.pt> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1954 Lines: 52 On Friday 17 March 2006 14:36, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.16-rc6 compared to 2.6.15. > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > of you was declared guilty for a breakage or I'm considering you in any > other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues. > > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. [snip...] > > > Subject : XFS oopses on my box sometimes > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6180 > Submitter : Avuton Olrich > Handled-By : Nathan Scott > Status : discussion in the bug > > Hi Adrian, Nathan and all, If think I might have hit this one! I managed to get an oops which showed xfs related functions on the backtrace. The process involved was "rm" and the specific stress test was some 32 paralell kernel builds (each one with "make -j8") on a quad Opteron box with a 1 TB xfs filesystem. Preemption was disabled. After that the machine was still alive, but an fsck.xfs after a reboot showed corruption that I was able to repair with xfs_repair. This was also with an almost empty filesystem, hence the similarity with the above bug report. This was sometime ago, using the git tree from February 23 and unfortunately I didn't record the oops and output from xfs_repair. I'll update my git tree tonight, rebuild and retest in hopes to find that oops again. FWIW I managed to hit this after some 4 to 6 hours of testing so it shouldn't take too long to report back. See you later... Best regards Claudio Martins - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/