Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:35:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:35:46 -0400 Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:20752 "EHLO toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:35:39 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD5E2C5.26F5A133@lexus.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:36:05 -0700 From: J Sloan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13-pre6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DevilKin CC: bill davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: More memory == better? In-Reply-To: <20011023161340.02EAC9BD76@pop3.telenet-ops.be> <20011023200715.AEF66217593@tartarus.telenet-ops.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DevilKin wrote: > On Tuesday 23 October 2001 21:49, bill davidsen wrote: > > > Just remember that to use this memory you need a large memory kernel. > > Ah, thats with HIGHMEM support? I've read a lot of awful things about it > here... how stable (aka usable) is it? I have 2 observations - If you don't enable highmem support, you'll be able to use about 960 MB of your 1 GB - no big loss, right? I've been running on a couple machines with SMP and the 4 GB option, and they seem quite stable (there was a highmem bug in the preempt patch, but that is fixed in the most recent release) All things considered, it works quite well. cu jjs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/