Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200528201937.038455891@infradead.org> <CAJhGHyCua-oTww9U26CJvfojxdfQGewH1T-JUro7gLKucT2+kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200528224835.GU2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200528224835.GU2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 07:05:54 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyAZVVyQx_3gEtcxF_NaOov4=oR9kN4qO4FAR==hTNa+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/entry: disallow #DB more
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:48 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:42:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:25 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > These patches disallow #DB during NMI/#MC and allow removing a lot of fugly code.
> > >
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > Will #DB be allowed in #DF?
>
> No, that whole thing is noinstr.

But it calls many functions, including die(), panic().
We don't want #DB to interfere how it die() and panic().
Since it is in fragile #DF, the #DB may mess it up and
make #DF fails to report and die.