Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 11:40:07 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree
Message-ID: <20200529034007.GA12648@xiangao.remote.csb>
References: <20200529114501.3e2ecc14@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20200529015111.GA23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200529015111.GA23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Al,

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:51:11AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:45:01AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   fs/erofs/super.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   e7cda1ee94f4 ("erofs: code cleanup by removing ifdef macro surrounding")
> > 
> > from the erofs tree and commit:
> > 
> >   91a7c5e1d30e ("erofs: convert to use the new mount fs_context api")
> > 
> > from the vfs tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> > 
> > diff --cc fs/erofs/super.c
> > index 8e46d204a0c2,2c0bad903fa6..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > @@@ -408,16 -365,12 +365,9 @@@ static int erofs_fc_fill_super(struct s
> >   	sb->s_time_gran = 1;
> >   
> >   	sb->s_op = &erofs_sops;
> >  -
> >  -#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR
> >   	sb->s_xattr = erofs_xattr_handlers;
> >  -#endif
> >   
> > - 	/* set erofs default mount options */
> > - 	erofs_default_options(sbi);
> > - 
> > - 	err = erofs_parse_options(sb, data);
> > - 	if (err)
> > - 		return err;
> > - 
> > - 	if (test_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL))
> > + 	if (test_opt(ctx, POSIX_ACL))
> >   		sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL;
> >   	else
> >   		sb->s_flags &= ~SB_POSIXACL;
> 
> FWIW, I would be glad to have that old erofs commit moved over to
> erofs tree...  Folks?

I'm fine with that, although I think it's mainly with vfs changes
so could be better though with vfs tree. I will add this patch
tomorrow anyway... Thanks for reminder!

Thanks,
Gao Xiang