Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp287495ybm; Thu, 28 May 2020 23:34:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3jsMq2ddlvDJDKcxWu3T1xa5VhqMjrf84HsESd3JQyJAUClD6LJH/8dSrRUOByK0nT3qJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b70:: with SMTP id cb16mr6942756edb.234.1590734087789; Thu, 28 May 2020 23:34:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590734087; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CB7pMcxvJQCeeEK1sG8bhxYMIEbGeAiHhgpVWjBOkUSUyLdhUm4DKiQAF32MilCnNT JVGNf6ip80ijm4j//tYFFryDpydOjnaieqQF4QK9/dhN8qfS6puf00koMSBP1UB+/X5n 2ABLsGTGHepLJ3IlGIa19wDri0BBcBXSM3acTEEKjWo8YSy0dASPiTDNqS0JCxE551zC IBtzZFToVsNsw4TnJxCt+Zu3mTi/Rbxzu6AqCXQxQE2ewNSPLATAf9UEeTO7cKzRDR6E fYBytwu8mKQxggE+A4IIN9TK1xZijEUxlg6z93VB+6ywCD6qfqfgk+AcZwTramEK9MDE BYyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=BNoZ2XYJOD/1c9noJbsTLNaWrtFoh6ZcaGy/LqRk1c4=; b=WocOwyh1zeXfKcdcvF2Eeb/Deot7CxYi5EvpfvHSezN+hBdnXRK3JxXmGsAs3h+2MM 7UEi2Kk3309OCRgu5MQ2gNh8o0F3ijkTuNIIvSl0akEw2WLoOzLXT7tELybIwrISVfrk l9IzsHNnF5dDfIHyc9g/JxkYohtFFvBRTwWFiU9Iyy49g+hXD316boKC9jVn8ztaWrEZ KeMiglb6S7bhF5NyP+69s6e9dXMewy+ajCheyLZp007P9HQnVdIr4gLXhP8fJrsaBjDW Eja12UDzEz0r8wK74nCw5A1677tueDt5Em4QhKQWUBB5SwgB+csF2j5gtm6XleXZwSB5 iMMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UE3NugHU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oz26si242461ejb.252.2020.05.28.23.34.24; Thu, 28 May 2020 23:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UE3NugHU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726167AbgE2GcQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 May 2020 02:32:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50956 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725308AbgE2GcP (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 02:32:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1100C03E969; Thu, 28 May 2020 23:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id nu7so763395pjb.0; Thu, 28 May 2020 23:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BNoZ2XYJOD/1c9noJbsTLNaWrtFoh6ZcaGy/LqRk1c4=; b=UE3NugHUUAkfF0oMX8fpEdkZU0HdWYx3tH6rIdaP1toLR56GvsNrdMRjClM5HYX0UQ 7JVd1a/KPD3dkhzXGicgwatafJQCvtxhhFrewquf6g+L/EaFJ4s6WjHKxKT3VWDGYfgz au10I6+lXS05BXO2s4M7pGkILcT22CGfrEhK8RLClsOl4z2lzNl2OgXMx0k6uuNraVXN zFuk5Mf0/xXNxp3CYMTA/Tuecz3jkjU1H/qrcPxSNS1uoClRqrCHSioTemWVNrSX/0O+ NE6ztpq+r5JxXrMtbTqDYFB42S0Xi3jRpBWug4mAflk3oGaIk54PVblm1DQMp/Wm0jZB quAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BNoZ2XYJOD/1c9noJbsTLNaWrtFoh6ZcaGy/LqRk1c4=; b=dRVvJfOVtS5MpudrzGh1e6BnvI18y0dqQcrSX2eVe30e9GuTMhXvhuu36shIMeWYyk imFW6zwWzjoU2pTHmpe/QUgxBJC7kASYE2Djx/4e0Ooi+3rXNkKHWllQ7uXmGFrZtzQ1 ptOylpBaC4wzifOA+e5eFT9gkS6c5Qlrf7f04nPHywiTGC3wIO9djjtRtLGnDIfck4wd ixFYJLfgsPCw4d+t5AIGmc5tUsOlz7NJsqyPzXvdd/ZiV/ovAfQjuWyw1C06L8qNkali qaaLbdvQPwaLYBEd7BXxI4k6P8PAdZnO3KbhOUf7KsEbnvNHIe0e2CE7en9aWC+2srNE L4Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qnHyI1ieccId6LI8Z1Y055xy5hGJ3BRM3E7boDce9UGPJUEq4 FSkM81S8im5214JPuvK1nG4rDjCsNco= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c40d:: with SMTP id k13mr6949150plk.342.1590733934955; Thu, 28 May 2020 23:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2404:7a87:83e0:f800:3c0d:7bea:2bcd:e53b? ([2404:7a87:83e0:f800:3c0d:7bea:2bcd:e53b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 128sm6230844pfd.114.2020.05.28.23.32.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 May 2020 23:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector To: Sungjong Seo Cc: kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp, mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp, motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp, 'Namjae Jeon' , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200525115052.19243-1-kohada.t2@gmail.com> <040701d634b1$375a2a40$a60e7ec0$@samsung.com> <48fe0abe-8b1c-bea2-820f-71ca141af072@gmail.com> <0bd201d63579$f9b03d00$ed10b700$@samsung.com> From: Tetsuhiro Kohada Message-ID: <308405a2-429d-b9aa-ca1c-a699570ae112@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:32:11 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0bd201d63579$f9b03d00$ed10b700$@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> I'll make another small patch, OK? > > No, It make sense to make v3, because you have renamed the variables in > boot_sector on this patch. OK. >> BTW >> I have a concern about fs_name. >> The exfat specification says that this field is "EXFAT". >> >> I think it's a important field for determining the filesystem. >> However, in this patch, I gave up checking this field. >> Because there is no similar check in FATFS. >> Do you know why Linux FATFS does not check this filed? >> And, what do you think of checking this field? > > FATFS has the same field named "oem_name" and whatever is okay for its value. > However, in case of exFAT, it is an important field to determine filesystem. > > I think it would be better to check this field for exFAT-fs. > Would you like to contribute new patch for checking it? I already have the code, so I'll add it to [PATCH 2/4 v3]. BR