Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 00:41:51 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc:     christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
        containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cyphar@cyphar.com,
        jannh@google.com, jeffv@google.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, palmer@google.com, rsesek@google.com,
        tycho@tycho.ws, Matt Denton <mpdenton@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/seccomp: Test SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD
Message-ID: <202005290036.3FEFFDA@keescook>
References: <20200528110858.3265-1-sargun@sargun.me>
 <20200528110858.3265-4-sargun@sargun.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200528110858.3265-4-sargun@sargun.me>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:08:58AM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> +	EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND, &resp), 0);
> +
> +	nextid = req.id + 1;
> +
> +	/* Wait for getppid to be called for the second time */
> +	sleep(1);

I always rebel at finding "sleep" in tests. ;) Is this needed? IIUC,
userspace will immediately see EINPROGRESS after the NOTIF_SEND
finishes, yes?

Otherwise, yes, this looks good.

-- 
Kees Cook