Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp341322ybm; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:17:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlpurE2J7LITpnOqe71yhEx2papQ5ZCeLrcC1R9T86EDsFrHDmp5y9VlYrcdTrNfRfPLZM X-Received: by 2002:a50:ec8d:: with SMTP id e13mr7352153edr.8.1590740248658; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:17:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590740248; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bmS9NakmTHGhoaWlnKk0fHqxAG1CpZhEawFZXa8FRnZCLxAC3rJOxTT/QWxjr3dQeG +zs5R5BT2Rp2JsoLRDZ2Q9WZuKren+49PebVE21jQmqJrqcBfpN23qaS6CJFO9fGdFwq VgzrupBCr4KaiqI9FIE5VOA7xRwW/zszpUwPyKYf8n8KhBbxSRXWiDs/ad5XcyAbI6Q/ 4l2IvX6xuzincd2oJsvTuUSUug744Z8LMdig7eCzkpgla2I6IGBzPqpmqD508WsqhWIu kkz8m1lIqz251pJdl7vFkk4CX8sQxy2fIJ1J8YvCat9TZdTRC3dqVN3eBy7Gb9P3Kstm faSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=6jJaLcSs+rSnc6xBgvxlkp1rl5AGraT8Qd5Yi79/Zl0=; b=n05RGJaH5D5GgMOl5c94k8x2rNduW4yTXAmo3/ep4LrP3D9fvSFqdGAFnoFyVYOLVG f63tpWZsa5IafUv4WRF/QwR05pOzIwNvjxRd937174vrVRJ1hjOxuAZcIBuNDVT0QIq0 4gE2wVegWFHZPj1FyjeFnJE8qTcGi6p5PjEP4AWuEGxne6zYyHoc/qWg/wVG5GVswBX/ xlOHEjiBML2z016FpEK/ng8F5wwk0L+3uraPLnF8qQfUgLTaK1MRKRoodbYNb78K61WJ v92pdF9VwhD8OQILLgDYEpzwAPnPeMbolTBqI5QH/BGASIn3D8lGEfL29tOWItMDxBrh 0hdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p11si2222422edq.151.2020.05.29.01.17.05; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726451AbgE2INK (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 May 2020 04:13:10 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:16098 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725775AbgE2INJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 04:13:09 -0400 IronPort-SDR: g1xkrO6bRpbLZ1Zp6apXBiP/LT5fJVeGOgNSPBc0xA3g+I3Z0M/nUP0jsqoSskykGVie8DWR3l j9BZqgsfB2Jg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 May 2020 01:13:09 -0700 IronPort-SDR: OQ3PeyfgSiBJMJwnXbX3YqkirXMCRbvTz50DlIcb4rQYCBwM07L+KCAmfkSZN4nsy1BQfm2+3l TB19md3n3fNQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,447,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="376640536" Received: from pratuszn-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.58.65]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2020 01:13:00 -0700 Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:12:58 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Borislav Petkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kai.svahn@intel.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, Jethro Beekman Subject: Re: [PATCH v30 08/20] x86/sgx: Add functions to allocate and free EPC pages Message-ID: <20200529081258.GA1376838@linux.intel.com> References: <20200527042111.GI31696@linux.intel.com> <20200527204638.GG1721@zn.tnic> <20200528012319.GA7577@linux.intel.com> <20200528013617.GD25962@linux.intel.com> <20200528065223.GB188849@linux.intel.com> <20200528171635.GB382@zn.tnic> <20200528190718.GA2147934@linux.intel.com> <20200528195917.GF30353@linux.intel.com> <20200529032816.GC6182@linux.intel.com> <20200529033716.GH30353@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200529033716.GH30353@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:37:16PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:28:16AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:59:17PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:07:18PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > * sgx_grab_page() - Grab a free EPC page > > > > * @owner: the owner of the EPC page > > > > * @reclaim: reclaim pages if necessary > > > > * > > > > * Iterate through EPC sections and borrow a free EPC page to the caller. When a > > > > * page is no longer needed it must be released with sgx_free_page(). If > > > > * @reclaim is set to true, directly reclaim pages when we are out of pages. No > > > > * mm's can be locked when @reclaim is set to true. > > > > * > > > > * Finally, wake up ksgxswapd when the number of pages goes below the watermark > > > > * before returning back to the caller. > > > > * > > > > * Return: > > > > * an EPC page, > > > > * -errno on error > > > > */ > > > > > > > > I also rewrote the kdoc. > > > > > > > > I do agree that sgx_try_grab_page() should be renamed as __sgx_grab_page(). > > > > > > FWIW, I really, really dislike "grab". The nomenclature for normal memory > > > and pages uses "alloc" when taking a page off a free list, and "grab" when > > > elevating the refcount. I don't understand the motivation for diverging > > > from that. SGX is weird enough as is, using names that don't align with > > > exist norms will only serve to further obfuscate the code. > > > > OK, what would be a better name then? The semantics are not standard > > memory allocation semantics in the first place. And kdoc in v30 speaks > > about grabbing. > > In what way are they not standard allocation semantics? sgx_alloc_page() > is an API to allocate (EPC) memory on-demand, sgx_free_page() is its partner > to free that memory when it is no longer needed. There are many different > ways to manage and allocate memory, but the basic premise is the same for > all and no different than what we're doing. I end up to (ignoring unchanged names): - __sgx_alloc_epc_page_from_section() (static) - __sgx_alloc_epc_page() - sgx_alloc_epc_page() - sgx_setup_epc_section() /Jarkko