Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] KVM: nSVM: correctly inject INIT vmexits
To:     Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     vkuznets@redhat.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
References: <20200526172308.111575-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
 <20200526172308.111575-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
 <a5331d80-b6ee-b111-c91b-a8723fd3da9b@oracle.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <25c0ab83-f7d7-44f9-b00f-59ecee0256dc@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 10:47:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a5331d80-b6ee-b111-c91b-a8723fd3da9b@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 29/05/20 08:46, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>>
>> +static void nested_svm_init(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> 
> Should this be named nested_svm_inject_init_vmexit in accordance with
> nested_svm_inject_exception_vmexit that you did in patch# 3 ?

There's also nested_svm_intr and nested_svm_nmi.  I'll rename all of
them, but it will be a follow up.

Paolo